POST 207: KÄTHE HEUSERMANN, DENTAL ASSISTANT TO MY UNCLE AND HITLER’S PERSONAL DENTIST: HER POSTWAR IDENTIFICATION OF HITLER’S DENTAL REMAINS

CORRECTIONS MADE ON 11TH SEPTEMBER 2026


Note: This post is inspired by a query from a Russian Holocaust researcher requesting permission to use documents and pictures of my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck . I’m revisiting the role that his erstwhile dental assistant Käthe Heusermann, later assistant to Hitler’s personal dentist, played in the identification of the
Führer‘s dental remains following the end of the Second World War. A collaborative French-Russian documentary produced in 2017, translated below for the benefit of readers, provides the historical context. 

Related Posts: 

POST 17: SURVIVING IN BERLIN IN THE TIME OF HITLER: MY UNCLE FEDOR’S STORY 

POST 40: ELISABETH “LISA” PAULY NÉE KRÜGER, ONE OF MY UNCLE FEDOR’S “SILENT HEROES” 

POST 40, POSTSCRIPT: ELISABETH “LISA” PAULY NÉE KRÜGER, ONE OF GERMANY’S SILENT HEROES—DISCOVERING HER HUSBAND’S FATE 

POST 41: DR. OTTO BERGER & OTHER “SILENT HEROES” WHO HELPED MY UNCLE DR. FEDOR BRUCK SURVIVE THE NAZI REGIME 

POST 186: THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN A GERMAN “DENTIST” AND A GERMAN “ZAHNARZT” AND WHAT IT TELLS US ABOUT HITLER’S DENTIST AND HITLER’S FATE  

 

This post is inspired by a recent contact from a Russian Holocaust researcher, Ms. Elena Godunova (Figure 1), requesting permission to use several pictures and documents published on my blog related to my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck. (Figure 2) Our subsequent back-and-forth emails resulted in obtaining a few fascinating pictures of and learning some lesser-known facts about Käthe Heusermann (1909-1993) who was my uncle’s dental assistant in Liegnitz, Germany (today: Legnica, Poland). (Figure 3)

 

Figure 1. Russian Holocaust researcher, Ms. Elena Godunova

 

Figure 2. My uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck in 1930

 

Figure 3. My uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck in his dental office in Liegnitz, Germany with his young dental assistant, Käthe Heusermann

 

Elena also shared a link to a documentary, a Russian-French collaboration, discussing Käthe’s historical role in identifying Hitler’s teeth after the Second World War and the personal toll it took on her. I’ve discussed this in previous posts and will review it below. From my own personal knowledge based on historical accounts and on writings my uncle left behind discussing what Käthe told him about Hitler’s fate, the documentary is exacting and accurate. For this reason, I asked my good friend’s daughter for help transcribing the French narrative using AI and translating it into English; at the bottom of this post is the correlation of the narrative with the names and titles of the narrators. This allows readers to follow along as they watch the documentary and learn about Käthe’s historical significance. 

I begin this post by reintroducing readers to my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck who has been the subject of several earlier publications, notably, Post 17 and Post 41. I revisit this topic as a way of reacquainting followers with Käthe Heusermann. 

After Käthe moved to Berlin she become the assistant to Hitler’s personal dentist, Dr. Hugo Blaschke (1881-1959). (Figure 4) He was American-trained and seems to have attained his position more by virtue of his early membership in the National Socialist Party than due to his technical skills. As a matter of fact, in my uncle’s writings he specifically remarked on Dr. Blaschke’s outmoded, therefore very distinctive, dental techniques. This becomes relevant to the postwar identification of Hitler’s recovered dental remains and pertinent to the story I’m about to relate.

 

Figure 4. Hitler’s dentist, Dr. Hugo Blaschke

 

Let me begin by reviewing the historical context under which the events described in this post unfolded. My Uncle Fedor obtained his dental license from the University of Breslau (today: University of Wrocław) in around 1921. He had a private practice in Liegnitz, Germany from November 1924 until April 1936, when he was forced by the Nazis to shutter his practice. 

While Hitler did not become chancellor of Germany until January 30, 1933, dark clouds loomed before his ascendancy. Already, by March 1932, a letter (Figure 5) among my uncle’s surviving papers document that he had been relieved of his responsibilities as a so-called “Schulzahnarzt,” a school dentist for small municipalities surrounding Liegnitz. Schulzahnärzten merely examined pupils’ teeth, advising them whether a follow-up with a dentist was warranted. It’s important to understand that among German dentists there was widespread support for the National Socialist ideology. In anticipation of their rise to power, many dental organizations displaced their Jewish colleagues as a sign of “anticipatory obedience.”

 

Figure 5. A letter to my uncle from the Magistrate of Liegnitz dated the 22nd of March 1932 relieving him of his responsibilities as a so-called “Schulzahnarzt”

 

Formal restrictions on Jewish professionals in Nazi Germany began primarily with the “Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service” passed on April 7, 1933. This law barred Jews and political opponents from holding government, university, and public-school jobs. Some concurrent 1933 decrees stripped Jewish lawyers of their licenses to practice and severely restricted Jewish doctors and medical practitioners from treating non-Jewish patients or receiving payments from state health insurance funds. The 1933 laws initially made minor exceptions for Jewish veterans who fought for Germany in the First World War or for those who had been in office since 1914. Since my Uncle Fedor had fought and been wounded on the Russian Front in WWI (Figure 6), he had an exemption to continue working.

 

Figure 6. My Uncle Fedor in his military uniform

 

However, in September 1935, the Nazi Regime introduced the Nuremberg Laws comprising the “Reich Citizenship Law” and the “Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor.” A supplementary decree to the citizenship law issued in November 1935 removed the 1933 exemptions for WWI veterans, forcing all remaining Jewish public officials and civil servants into retirement by the end of 1935. By April 1936, my uncle had sold or shut down his practice. Presumably he left for Berlin shortly thereafter. 

Käthe may have relocated to Berlin at roughly the same time as my uncle. However, it’s unlikely she intended to continue working as his dental assistant given the increasingly restrictive prohibitions against associating with Jews. While Käthe worked for my uncle in a professional capacity in Liegnitz rather than in private employ, the Nazi regime prohibited Jewish households from employing German (non-Jewish) domestic workers under the age of 45 under the aforementioned “Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor.” The Nazis claimed this would prevent “race defilement” (Rassenschande), falsely alleging that Jewish men would have sexual relations with young German maids. 

Regardless, Käthe went on to work for Hitler’s dentist through circumstances that are unknown. By her own account she worked for Dr. Blaschke for almost ten years, roughly from 1936 until 1945. It is known Hitler had a designated dental office at the Reichstag where he received treatment. Most relevant to this post is that as Dr. Blaschke’s dental assistant, Käthe was always present when he attended to the Führer’s oral care. Thus, she was very familiar with the dental procedures that had been performed on him and with Blaschke’s signature dental work. 

As for my uncle, after leaving for Berlin, he could still work though under very trying circumstances. He continued to have a private practice at Fasanenstraße 20 in Berlin-Charlottenburg for a time. However, after the “Regulation for the Elimination of the Jews from the Economic Life of Germany” was enacted in February 1939, my uncle had his dental license revoked. Only in November 1939 was he again certified, but then only as a so-called “Zahnbehandler,” which meant he could only treat Jews and relatives. 

A document found in the archives at the Centrum Judaicum Berlin shows that during this period, specifically on June 11, 1939, my uncle converted from Judaism at the Messiah Chapel in Berlin’s Prenzlauer Berg, Kastanienallee 22. (Figure 7) He must still have believed at this late date, even after the violent pogrom of Kristallnacht the previous 9th-10th of November 1938, that conversion to Protestantism would alter his fate. I can only conclude that his status as a wounded German veteran of the First World War clouded his judgement making him believe this provided a protective cloak, though the supplementary decree accompanying passage of the Nuremberg Laws had specifically removed protection for Jewish veterans of WWI.

 

Figure 7. Messias Kapelle in Berlin where my Uncle Fedor converted to Protestantism in 1939 (former Evangelical Church)

 

For several months starting in March 1941, my uncle had the good fortune of managing the practice of a colleague preparing to emigrate from Germany. Then, again, in June 1941, he took over a well-equipped practice located in Kürfurstendamm. Thus, compared to many of his fellow Jews, for a time, he was better off economically. By January 1942, however, he had been permanently displaced from this last office by an Aryan colleague. 

Eventually, in a letter dated October 12, 1942 (Figure 8), my uncle was summoned by the Gestapo to present himself to an “age transport.” 

 

Figure 8. Letter dated October 12, 1942, telling my uncle to report to report for an “age transport”

 

Regarding Deportation

The undersigned has presented your evacuation case to the relevant authority. 

The application for a deferral was rejected; however, following this consultation, you have been assigned to the transport for the elderly—under the transport number indicated above—instead of the transport to the East. 

Respectfully,

Jewish Cultural Association of Berlin (Registered Association) – The Executive Board 

Realizing this meant deportation to a concentration camp and a death sentence, he fled to a friend living in Dahlem within the borough of Steglitz-Zehlendorf and went into hiding. This was the beginning of a two-and-a-half-year ordeal living “underground” in Berlin. In the ensuing months, Uncle Fedor found refuge with a cousin (see Post 40) or hid in “green belts,” coal cellars, and parks. 

Most helpful to him during his clandestine odyssey was a fellow dentist by the name of Dr. Otto Berger, a right-minded individual vehemently opposed to the National Socialists. Berger was somehow able to illegally procure papers for Fedor in the name of Dr. Friedrich Burkhardt (Figure 9), matching my uncle’s own initials; without this identity card, it is hard to imagine how my uncle would have survived.

 

Figure 9. My uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck’s false identity paper in the name of “Dr. Friedrich Burkhardt”

 

In March 1944, both Berger and my uncle were among nine survivors from a group of 44 people who had sought refuge from Allied bombing in an air raid shelter. Following this narrow escape, for a short period Fedor again hid with his cousin before returning to live with Berger. First, they lived in Berlin-Zehlendorf, then in an apartment in Berlin-Steglitz. Their last flat was destroyed by fire on the eve of the Russian push to capture Steglitz on April 26, 1945. 

It is worth noting that Roger Moorhouse, in his book entitled “Berlin at War: Life and Death in Hitler’s Capital 1939-1945,” estimates that of the 11,000 Jews who hid underground in Berlin between 1939 and 1945, only about 1,400 survived. My uncle was one of those. Luck certainly played a part. When his friend Dr. Sieber was arrested in his presence by the Gestapo on February 15, 1943, he was miraculously spared. It’s unclear how important his pre-war connections and non-Jewish relatives were to his survival, though they likely played a role. 

The capture by the Russians of Berlin-Steglitz where my uncle last lived with Dr. Berger marked the beginning of the next phase of my uncle’s life in Berlin. After the Russian capture of Berlin on May 4, 1945, my uncle followed in their footsteps and made his way to Käthe Heusermann’s apartment in Pariserstraße in Berlin-Wilmersdorf where he found her. Astonishingly, there is evidence to suggest that during his time underground my uncle was occasionally hidden by Käthe in her apartment. 

The Nazi command had wanted Käthe to evacuate to Obersalzberg as Dr. Blaschke and other high ranking Nazis hiding in the Reich Chancellery with Hitler were ordered to do. Käthe refused. She insisted on staying in Berlin hoping for the return of her soldier husband. 

Käthe Heusermann’s refusal to be evacuated to Obersalzberg may have saved her life. Käthe was seemingly tasked with packing Dr. Blaschke’s dental records and equipment, including Hitler’s records at the Reichstag. The plane carrying those records crashed and eight of the nine passengers aboard were killed. There is reason to believe Käthe would have been aboard this flight. The Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A) website includes a photo of the destroyed aircraft, a Junkers JU.352 Herkules, that went down in Börnersdorf. (Figure 10)

 

Figure 10. Details and photo of the Junkers JU.352 Herkules containing Hitler’s dental records that crashed on April 21, 1945, in Börnersdorf, Germany (photo credit: Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archive)

 

Having been present in the Reich Chancellery until almost the Nazi regime’s bitter end, Käthe had learned of the Führer’s fate from his inner circle. According to my uncle’s written account, Käthe had told him what had happened to Hitler. My uncle’s former close association with Käthe Heusermann inadvertently made him a “witness” to history. After the war reporters and writers were wont to dismiss his account. Afterall, how could a Jewish survivor know whether Hitler had survived the war? 

The office building where Dr. Blaschke had his dental practice had only been slightly damaged. It was in Berlin-Charlottenburg, in the district of Berlin then occupied by the Russians. Käthe encouraged my uncle to apply to the Russians to take over Dr. Blaschke’s largely intact office. As a victim of National Socialism, he was entitled to such consideration. 

With the approval of the Russian commandant, my uncle was assigned Blaschke’s office and living quarters. Among my uncle’s surviving papers is a pass dated the 30th of May 1945 written in both German and Cyrillic permitting him safe passage to access his office and presumably move about. (Figures 11a-b) 

 

Figure 11a. Pass dated May 30, 1945, written in both German and Cyrillic, allowing my Uncle Fedor unhindered access to Dr. Blaschke’s former office

 

Figure 11b. Closeup of the Cyrillic writing on my uncle’s pass allowing him unhindered access to Dr. Blaschke’s former office

 

Dr. Blaschke’s dental office was located at Kürfurstendamm 213, in a building that still stands. (Figure 12) Post-war Berlin phone and address directories for both 1946 (Figure 13) and 1948 attest to this. They list my uncle Fedor Bruck as a “Zahnarzt” (dentist) occupying these premises, as indeed he did until he left for America in 1947 (his name continues to show up in the 1948 phone directory even though he was no longer in Berlin).

 

Figure 12. Entrance to Dr. Blaschke’s former office at Kürfurstendamm 213 as it looks today

 

Figure 13. 1946 Berlin phone directory listing my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck’s dental practice at Kurfurtendamm 213, Dr. Blaschke’s former office

 

According to the documentary translated below, Elena Rzhevskaya (Figure 14) from SMERSH, who ended the Second World War with the rank of Lieutenant, was tasked soon after hostilities ended in Berlin with ascertaining Hitler’s fate and determining whether dental remains discovered in the garden of the Reich Chancellery belonged to him.

 

Figure 14. Elena Rzhevskaya from SMERSH tasked with discovering Hitler’s fate after the fall of the Nazi Empire (photo credit: Elena Rzhevskaya’s book “Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter: From the Battle of Rzhev to Hitler’s Bunker”)

 

SMERSH is an acronym for the Russian phrase Smert‘ shpionam, which translates directly to “death to spies.” Coined by Joseph Stalin, SMERSH was an umbrella term for independent counterintelligence agencies in the Soviet Red Army. As a trivial aside, in popular culture author Ian Fleming made the name famous by featuring SMERSH as James Bond’s ruthless fictional enemy organization. 

Elena Rzhevskaya was given a velvet-lined box containing the dental remains discovered in the Reich Chancellery and tasked with determining whether they belonged to Hitler. She immediately went in search of Hitler’s then-unknown dentist. She would eventually learn that his dental office, now occupied by my uncle, was still intact. She headed there in search of information about Blaschke. 

In writings my uncle left behind, he remarks on the arrival in his office of Russian military personnel including an unnamed woman who could have been none other than Elena Rzhevskaya. My uncle never mentioned her name, likely because she never told him. She asked about Dr. Blaschke and was told he had fled Berlin.  However, my uncle mentioned that Käthe Heusermann, as well as Fritz Echtmann, Dr. Blaschke’s dental technician, were still in Berlin. My uncle was ordered to fetch Käthe, and upon arrival she was interrogated by the Russians. 

As mentioned above, Käthe Heusermann had always been present when Hitler was undergoing dental treatment. Because Hitler was always treated in a specially equipped dental office at the Reichstag, none of his dental records appear to have been stored in Dr. Blaschke’s office. Because Hitler’s dental records were not found at the Reichstag, Elena Rzhevskaya was compelled to rely on Käthe’s description of the work that had been performed on Hitler. As the translated documentary below tells us, Käthe was asked to describe the work Blaschke had performed on Hitler from memory. She was NEVER shown the dental remains that had been recovered in the shallow grave at the Reich Chancellery. Nonetheless, her description and sketches of the dental procedures Blaschke had performed on Hitler precisely matched those that appeared on the dental remains from the Reich Chancellery. While she was endlessly cross-examined by Russian officials, Käthe was consistent in her description of Hitler’s teeth and the work done on them. As the documentary attests, based on her testimony, the Russians had no doubt Hitler had killed himself. 

Nonetheless, Stalin assertively lied to the Allies and claimed that Hitler had fled to either Spain or Argentina or escaped in a submarine to Japan. Stalin chose to conceal what had happened to Hitler. For him, knowledge was power and he could potentially use the information about Hitler’s fate against the Allies in the future in yet unknown ways. Afterall, the “cold war” had already started. 

The fact that Stalin didn’t want the world knowing Hitler was dead put both Käthe Heusermann and Fritz Echtmann in danger, and in fact both were eventually arrested, taken to Russia, and given ten-year prison sentences. They were not released until 1955. Readers can pick up the thread of what happened to Käthe by reading the translation of the documentary below. 

As a side note, my Uncle Fedor was warned by the Americans that because of his knowledge of Hitler’s fate and Stalin’s wish to keep this information concealed, he too was in danger of being whisked away by the Russians. It’s for this reason that he fled Berlin and left his dental practice behind. 

As mentioned at the outset, Elena Godunova, the Russian Holocaust researcher who inspired this post, sent me a few pictures of Käthe Heusermann and Fritz Echtmann taken in Moscow. These include mugshots of the two of them (Figures 15-16) after their arrest by the Russian NKVD (Romanized: Narodnyy komissariat vnutrennikh del), the People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs; this was the interior ministry and the secret police of the Soviet Union from 1934 to 1946. The other is of Käthe and Fritz with two Russian officers in a park setting possibly in Berlin. (Figure 17)

 

Figure 15. Mugshot of Käthe Heusermann taken by the NKVD after her arrest and deportation to Russia (photo credit: Электронная библиотека исторических документов (ЭБИД) | Агония и смерть Адольфа Гитлера)

 

Figure 16. Mugshot of Fritz Echtmann, Dr. Blaschke’s dental technician, taken by the NKVD after his arrest and deportation to Russia (photo credit: Электронная библиотека исторических документов (ЭБИД) | Агония и смерть Адольфа Гитлера)

 

Figure 17. Käthe Heusermann and Fritz Echtmann with two Russian officers in a photo possibly taken in Berlin (photo credit: 10 лет тюрьмы: как СССР «отблагодарил» женщину, которая помогла опознать труп Гитлера https://share.google/ISgAVFfclRLwOB1yh)

 

Of particular interest, Elena Godunova shared a Russian article about one of Hitler’s first cousins, Maria Koppensteiner (1899-1953). Maria was the daughter of Hitler’s mother’s sister. The Koppensteiners lived in the town of Gmünd in Lower Austria that fell within the Soviet occupation zone after the war. In late May 1945, Maria Koppensteiner was arrested by the counter-intelligence unit of the 3rd Ukrainian Front, along with other members of her family. Hitler’s cousin was arrested based on “kinship liability,” according to Austrian historian Stefan Karner, though Maria had not seen her cousin Adolf since 1907. 

Initially, Hitler’s relatives were imprisoned in Lefortovo Prison in Moscow. Of personal interest is that for a time Maria shared a cell with Käthe Heusermann. One of my readers rhetorically asked: “One wonders whether it was intentional putting them together, maybe to see if they would talk about Hitler (their cells had listening devices, from what I can tell from reports of the prisoners’ conversations being quoted in their intelligence reports). I recall someone saying Heusermann suspected the Soviets of planting ‘moles’ as cell-companions, so they could trick the prisoners into talking about Hitler.” (Andrew van Ginkel, personal communication) 

According to the documentary, Käthe Heusermann was not formally tried until 1951. She was given a ten-year prison term and credited for the 6 ½ years she’d already spent in prison by the time she was convicted. She was exiled to Siberia, and according to Elena Godunova, was held at Ozerlag in the Irkutsk region, likely transported there and back along the Trans-Siberian Railway. Käthe wrote a short account of her years of imprisonment, leaving it forgotten at the back of a drawer, and never looked back. In 1992, she was rehabilitated as a “victim of political repression.” Käthe Heusermann died in 1993. 

As we speak, I’m working with Elena Godunova to try and contact Lioubov Summ, the granddaughter of Elena Rzhevskaya, hoping to obtain a copy of Käthe Heusermann’s unpublished memoir. Beyond being of historical interest, I’m curious whether Käthe mentions working for my uncle as a dental assistant in Liegnitz.

 

Figure 18. Ms. Lioubov Summ, Elena Rzhevskaya’s granddaughter, who may have a copy of Käthe Heusermann’s unpublished memoir

 

 

Mort d’Hitler, l’histoire d’un secret d’État TRANSLATION 

EDITOR’S NOTE: THE TEXT BELOW STANDS ON ITS OWN SHOULD READERS CHOOSE NOT TO VIEW THE 52-MINUTE DOCUMENTARY. 

NARRATOR: This is the final battle. Berlin is a gigantic pile of rubble, and the Nazi empire is now confined to the streets of the capital’s center, which is under siege by the Red Army. 

For our soldiers, the priority is to capture the leader of the Third Reich—it is a symbol, a symbol of war and fascism.  He is, therefore, a trophy, and everyone is searching for him. 

Where is Hitler?  To whom do the charred remains found in the Chancellery garden belong—remains that, some time ago, were miraculously pulled intact from the rubble? Will they reveal the fate of the Nazi dictator? 

Two young women. One is Soviet—Elena Rzhevskaya, an interpreter for the Red Army. The other is German— Käthe Heusermann, Hitler’s dentist’s assistant.  They are at the heart of the investigation and play a decisive role in identifying the remains of the Nazi leader. 

The witness states, “I clearly recognize the gold teeth and dentures presented to me.” 

Stalin is immediately informed of the discovery of the remains and then of their identification. He knows there is no doubt. Hitler is dead. 

Stalin knows the truth. Hitler is dead, but he chooses to lie and tells the Allies that the monster is alive and has managed to escape. 

Why didn’t Stalin tell the Allies anything? To keep a secret? It could always come in handy. 

The story of Hitler’s death is characteristic of Stalin’s paranoid attitude toward the West.

Stalin’s lie about Hitler’s death lasted nearly 50 years. All the evidence is hidden. Kept secret until the day the Soviet Union disappears and the truth can finally be told. 

Nothing can be hidden. Everything eventually comes to light. Everyone should learn this lesson from history. 

For the Soviet Union, the war began in June 1941 with a surprise attack by Hitler. Within a few months, the enemy was at the gates of Moscow, and Stalin ordered the mass mobilization of the population. The regiments—almost entire armies—marching through Red Square set off directly for the front. 

Elena is just 22 years old and already has a two-year-old child, but the Red Army needs interpreters, and Elena, who speaks German, enlists.  Four years later, she is part of the first Soviet detachment to enter Berlin, tasked with capturing the Nazi leaders. No one knows where Hitler is; he is said to be dead or dying, the victim of a cerebral hemorrhage. Or perhaps his officers executed him—unless he took his own life. But according to Soviet radio reporters following in the Red Army’s wake in Berlin, Hitler is, on the contrary, very much alive and in hiding in the Tyrol. It is a lookalike who is fighting in his place in the streets of the capital, watched over by Nazi propaganda officials who are waiting for the moment he falls so they can photograph him and deceive the Allies. A final rumor claims that Hitler is hiding in the ruins of the Reichstag. It is a historic moment—The storming of the Nazi Parliament and Elena hasn’t forgotten a thing. 

ELENA RZHEVSKAYA: I’m going around in circles. It was our division that led the attack on the Reichstag.  It was a stroke of luck and a great honor for us. 

NARRATOR: They attacked the Reichstag thinking Hitler was hiding there, but in reality, no one knew where he was. 

Hitler was not at the Reichstag, as the Soviet command had believed. The Red Army’s vanguard then headed toward the Chancellery—the heart of Nazi power. 

ELENA RZHEVSKAYA: It was terrifying to imagine that Hitler might still be there. We were on edge. Where is Hitler—alive or dead?  

NARRATOR: German radio had just announced the Führer’s death, fallen in his heroic struggle against Bolshevism.  And that night, the German Chief of Staff, General Krebs, made his way to Soviet headquarters. He wanted to begin peace talks and informed his counterpart, Marshal Zhukov, of Hitler’s death. 

In his memoirs, Zhukov recalls immediately having Stalin woken up in Moscow. “He got what he deserved—that bastard. Where is the body?” asks Stalin. “According to the German general, the body was burned,” replies Zhukov. “Too bad we couldn’t take him alive,” concludes the master of the Kremlin. 

While people continue to die in the streets of downtown Berlin, the small group of scouts, along with Elena, the interpreter, makes its way to the Chancellery Garden. Right above the bunker where Hitler may have been hiding for several months. 

He comes upon a chaotic scene, a landscape pockmarked by shells and corpses everywhere.  They quickly recognize the first body, Joseph Goebbels, then his wife Magda and their six children. 

ELENA RZHEVSKAYA: Goebbels’ body was burned but still recognizable. It was carried out onto the street in front of the Chancellery to be displayed—to show Hitler’s close associate, the Minister of Propaganda. In Hitler’s absence it was already a symbol of the fall of the Third Reich.  

NARRATOR: Hitler’s body had not yet been found, but the very next day, the news of his death made headlines on the front pages of newspapers around the world. 

Except in the Soviet Union. Pravda, the official organ of the Communist Party and the voice of the Kremlin, wrote that the announcement of Hitler’s death was a ruse intended to facilitate the Nazi leader’s escape. As a result, in Paris as well, people were filled with doubt and uncertainty. 

In the garden of the Chancellery. The search continues everywhere—through the rubble, the shell craters, the piled-up bodies. Suddenly, someone thinks they recognize the monster’s mustache on one of the corpses. Immediately, there is excitement and confusion; people are brought in from the bunker, and the truth must be faced: it is not Hitler—the mustache alone is not enough to make the dictator—but the legend of the lookalike is born. 

On orders from the Soviet high command, the entire occupying Red Army is searching for Hitler, but the actual investigation is secret and limited to just three people: Major Gorbushin, Commander Bistrof, and Elena, the indispensable interpreter without whom no interrogation of German prisoners is possible. The two officers are part of the SMERSH, a military intelligence unit that reports directly to Stalin. 

NIKITA PETROV (HISTORIAN—ONG MEMORIAL): The SMERSH is a special intelligence unit under Stalin’s direct authority, headed by Victor Abakumov, who was considered at the time to be one of Stalin’s protégés and oversaw the most secret operations. He spied on the generals. He eavesdropped on all conversations. In short, he deals not only with spies who might attempt to infiltrate the Red Army, but also with traitors within the army itself. Abakoumov keeps an eye on everyone. Stalin entrusts him only with the most secret and delicate missions—if you can call them that. 

NARRATOR: It is the SMERSH that is investigating Hitler’s death. This demonstrates Stalin’s involvement in this matter, as well as the absolute discretion that must surround the investigations. The top-secret reports from the special unit are read by only three people: Stalin, of course, Molotov, the foreign minister, and Beria, the sinister head of the NKVD—the predecessor to the KGB. 

In the stifling atmosphere of the bunker, Elena sorts through the papers on Hitler’s desk and interrogates the first prisoners. 

ELENA RZHEVSKAYA: On May 4, I interviewed a small man, the bunker’s heating engineer. He was the one in charge of ventilation in the rooms occupied by Hitler. He saw how the lifeless bodies of Hitler and Eva Braun were carried out of the bunker. 

NARRATOR: Based on the initial statements from their prisoners, the investigators are convinced that Hitler remained holed up in his bunker until the very end and strongly suspect that he committed suicide just before the arrival of the first Soviet soldiers. They also know that all the gas for the vehicles stored in the Chancellery garage was requisitioned after 12 p.m. on April 30. Did Hitler disappear without a trace by ordering that his body be completely burned after his death? Are there still remains to be found, and where should they be searched for? 

SERGEY MIRONENKO (HISTORIAN—FORMER DIRECTOR OF THE RUSSIAN STATE ARCHIVE): The bodies of Hitler and Eva Braun were discovered entirely by chance. In the garden of the Chancellery a soldier saw the tip of a boot in good condition sticking out of a hole covered with dirt. He decided to pull it out and found two bodies. 

RUDOLF PIKHOYA (HISTORIAN, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE ARCHIVES COMMITTEE): At that point, they did not know if it was really Hitler, unlike Goebbels’s body, which was recognizable because gas had to be economized and his features had been spared. These remains were completely charred. 

NARRATOR: Official Report on the Discovery of Two Bodies.  May 5, 1945. Near Hitler’s bunker, we discovered and exhumed two burned bodies that were impossible to identify. 

The Goebbels family, several officers, and remains that are still unidentified.  The SMERSH now holds about ten remains, some more charred than others. 

Vice Admiral Vos admitted to being one of the last people to have seen Goebbels and Hitler alive. Identifying Goebbels poses no problem, but the body believed to be Hitler’s is too badly damaged to be visually identified, even by a member of the inner circle. 

After the autopsy, doubts remain. The results are consistent with what is known about Hitler—his height and weight. But the doctors cannot say with certainty that these charred remains are indeed all that is left of him. There is only one hope left for identifying him.  The teeth. 

ELENA RZHEVSKAYA: Both jaws were well preserved.  15 teeth on the lower jaw.  On May 8, my commander, Major Gorbushin, asked me to come see him.  He handed me a burgundy-colored box and said, “These are Hitler’s teeth. You are responsible for them.” 

NARRATOR: It was Victory Day, the end of a war that had claimed tens of millions of victims. Amid the ruins of Berlin, Elena, the 25-year-old Soviet interpreter, refrains from toasting or joining in the celebrations. She is the secret guardian of a small box lined with red satin that may contain all that remains of the mad dictator who led the world into catastrophe. 

In the suburbs of Berlin, in the middle of the night, under the chairmanship of Marshal Zhukov, the Allies, facing Marshal Ketel, sign Germany’s act of surrender. 

This time the war is finally over. 

First thing in the morning, Elena and her officers set out in search of the one person who would surely know the name of the owner of the teeth: Hitler’s dentist.  The investigators know nothing about him—neither his name nor his address, let alone whether he is still alive and in Berlin. 

After a day of wandering and following dead ends, they finally obtain a name and, at the same time, the information that the dentist fled the city about fifteen days ago. But they also learn that his assistant has remained in Berlin, hoping for the return of her soldier husband.  A few hours later, Elena meets Käthe Heusermann, a smiling, friendly young woman who, for nearly 10 years, has been present at every one of Hitler’s visits to his dentist. The Führer’s teeth should hold no secrets for her. 

LIOUBOV SUMM (GRANDDAUGHTER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA): She became the key witness because teeth are of no use unless one also finds the person who can identify them.  

NICOLAY VLADIMIRTSEV (HISTORIAN AT THE RUSSIAN NATIONAL ARCHIVES): During the interrogation of Käthe Heusermann, the witness states: “I clearly recognize the gold teeth and dentures presented to me. They belong to Chancellor Hitler.” The witness made the same statement regarding Eva Braun. This testimony is the most important piece of evidence.  It proves that these teeth truly belong to Hitler. 

ELENA RZHEVSKAYA: She had been asked to draw a diagram of Hitler’s teeth, but without showing her the teeth that had been found.  

NARRATOR: Käthe was present at all of the Führer’s dental appointments, and she hasn’t forgotten a single detail about Hitler’s disastrous set of teeth.  Her drawing matches exactly the jawbone found by the Soviets. There is no longer any doubt: the charred body discovered in a hole in the Chancellery garden is all that remains of the greatest criminal of the 20th century.  

LIOUBOV SUMM (GRANDDAUGHTER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA): On May 11, they escorted her home with heartfelt thanks and many cans of food.  They know they’ve successfully identified Hitler.  So, to thank Käthe Heusermann, they give her food, but for themselves, they were hoping to receive medals. 

NARRATOR: Hitler is indeed dead. But is Stalin aware? For the Soviet command in Berlin, it’s very clear. Hitler is dead, and Stalin is immediately informed. 

RUDOLF PIKHOYA (HISTORIAN, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE ARCHIVES COMMITTEE): Failing to give Stalin a detailed report on such a matter is completely impossible. Absolutely out of the question, because Hitler is a symbol that carries very strong political significance, like the storming of the Reichstag and the conquest of Berlin. 

NIKITA PETROV (HISTORIAN—ONG MEMORIAL): It’s obvious. Stalin was immediately informed of the discovery of the remains and then of their identification. He knew there was no doubt. Hitler was dead. 

NARRATOR: Stalin rarely left the Kremlin, but he had eyes and ears everywhere.  Every day, documents concerning Hitler’s death and identification pile up on his desk, becoming increasingly precise and definitive.  And following Käthe Heusermann’s testimony, it is no longer a matter of speculation—we know. Hitler is dead, and Stalin has been informed.

However, a few days later, a general whose identity has remained secret arrives in Berlin to verify everything. 

LIOUBOV SUMM (GRANDDAUGHTER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA): The general resumes all the interrogations, and for the first time, Elena, as an interpreter, is warned that she will be held responsible in the event of an erroneous translation. Everyone is warned and threatened. 

NARRATOR: For the purposes of the new investigation, the SMERSH comes to fetch Käthe Heusermann and orders him to pack a suitcase for an absence of about a week. 

LIOUBOV SUMM (GRANDDAUGHTER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA): Minutes of the supplementary interrogation of Käthe Heusermann. It is recorded that it began at 1:15 a.m. and ended at 6:00 a.m.  The questions are repeated endlessly—always the same ones. She is made to say, over and over, what she knows about Hitler’s teeth, and after she has explained everything, she is asked the same question again.  “So, you continue to assert that the teeth and dentures presented to you belong to Hitler?”  “Yes, I confirm that.” The document is only five pages long, but we know the interrogation lasted 5 hours. So, we can imagine how many times she was forced to repeat the same answers. 

NARRATOR: The unnamed general did not sign any official record. And at the end of the second investigation, which fully confirmed the first, he leaves just as mysteriously as he arrived. Investigators are certain of Hitler’s death thanks to Käthe Heusermann’s positive identification of his teeth.  But this information has still not been made public, and the Soviet command in Berlin officially maintains the order to search for Hitler, dead or alive. A medal is even promised to whoever succeeds in capturing him. Yet, although the SMERSH investigation was conducted in the utmost secrecy, rumors are circulating outside the Soviet zone, and the international press is picking up on them. The Russians are said to have found and identified the remains of the Nazi leader. 

Even the world is wondering, awaiting the necessary Soviet confirmation. 

The next act takes place in the Kremlin. Harry Hopkins is an advisor to U.S. President Truman, and he arrives in Moscow in late May 1945 for a series of meetings with Stalin to prepare for the first postwar conference among the Big Three.  When Hopkins asks Stalin where Hitler is, Stalin replies that he believes Hitler is alive, that he managed to escape, and that he may have fled in a submarine to seek refuge in Japan. 

This was the first false claim regarding Hitler’s death made by Stalin himself and recorded in black and white in the secret memorandum that was sent to Washington that very evening. 

Ten days later, in Berlin, Marshal Zhukov held a press conference for foreign correspondents.  They expect the rumors about the discovery and identification of Hitler’s remains to be confirmed. But to the journalists’ surprise, Zhukov asserts, on the contrary, that no trace of Hitler could be found, that he is therefore certainly alive, that he managed to escape by plane, and that he has taken refuge in Spain or Argentina. 

NIKITA PETROV (HISTORIAN—ONG MEMORIAL): Zhukov’s statement can be explained by the fact that he follows Stalin’s orders to the letter, since Stalin did not order him to tell the truth. The bodies were found and identified. So, he is lying. 

RUDOLF PIKHOYA (HISTORIAN, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE ARCHIVES COMMITTEE): Why didn’t Stalin say anything to the Allies? The answer is not simple. It is more of a psychological matter—knowing something that others do not know. It’s always advantageous to hold onto a secret. It can always come in handy. 

NIKITA PETROV (HISTORIAN—ONG MEMORIAL): The story of Hitler’s death is characteristic of Stalin’s paranoid attitude toward the West. We mustn’t give them too much information or evidence. Perhaps one day, it will be to our advantage to have left them in the dark. 

NARRATOR: That’s it—the lie has been thrown in the world’s face. There is widespread consternation, because no one can imagine that, just one month after the joint victory, the Soviets could lie to their allies about such a matter. Why? To what end?  It’s absurd. No. If Zhukov claims that Hitler hasn’t been found, then he hasn’t been found. 

A few weeks later, Stalin, Truman, and Churchill met in Potsdam, near Berlin, for their first postwar summit.  The future was being decided here in discussions among the three leaders, and particularly the future of Eastern Europe. 

NIKITA PETROV (HISTORIAN—ONG MEMORIAL): At that time, the disagreements between the Soviet Union and the Allies were only getting worse due to Soviet control over the countries of Eastern Europe and because of Soviet policy in the territories occupied by the Red Army. 

NARRATOR: Compared to these issues, the question of Hitler’s fate was obviously of very secondary importance. However, an advisor to Truman recounts that during an informal dinner with the American president, Stalin asserted once again that Hitler was alive and was either in Spain or Argentina. In Potsdam, the three leaders also had to decide which Nazi leaders would be placed in the dock in a few months, at the Nuremberg trials. Stalin had just reiterated this. Hitler is alive. He, therefore, should be at the top of the list of criminals to be tried. But curiously, no one asked for him. Not the Americans, not the British, not even Stalin. 

LIOUBOV SUMM (GRANDDAUGHTER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA): Everything is kept secret in case it might be needed one day. This is the reality of our country, the Soviet Union, where everything operates according to the rules of the secret police.  Everyone is watched, threatened, and intimidated. 

ELENA RZHEVSKAYA: It could be said that Stalin’s decision to hide what belonged to all the Allies was the first Soviet move in the Cold War. 

NARRATOR: For Elena, the time has come to take off her uniform and put on a pretty dress and ladies’ shoes.  A few souvenir photos and one last visit to Käthe, the key witness to Hitler’s death, who is still being held at Soviet headquarters.  Between interrogations, the young women hit it off.  The Russian interpreter and the German dental assistant feel they’ve been part of an extraordinary adventure, even if it must remain a secret. 

LIOUBOV SUMM (GRANDDAUGHTER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA): Their last conversation was very warm. Käthe said, “I, too, will soon be free. I’m going back to Berlin. We can meet before you leave; I’ll take you to my hairdresser.” And in the end, it didn’t happen. 

NARRATOR: The Great Patriotic War lasted four years. It ravaged the Soviet Union, costing it more than 20 million lives.  Elena’s husband died in battle. Her daughter has grown up, and Elena now dreams of becoming a writer.  But she is worried. She knows she knows something that the Kremlin leader has decided must remain a secret.  

IOURI KAGAN (BROTHER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA):  Those who had participated in the investigation into Hitler’s death were aware that they held a state secret, and they could confide in no one.  At the time, Elena didn’t tell me, her father, or her mother, about it. We didn’t know her story. 

NARRATOR: For their part, the British and Americans have not given up on uncovering the truth about Hitler’s mysterious disappearance, and they still hope to obtain Soviet assistance. 

NICOLAY VLADIMIRTSEV (HISTORIAN AT THE RUSSIAN NATIONAL ARCHIVES): Here is a request for information sent by the Anglo-American Allies to the Soviet command in Berlin.  Our generals have forwarded this letter to Molotov and Stalin and are requesting instructions.  What information are they authorized to disclose, and may they cooperate with the Anglo-American investigation into Hitler’s death? 

NARRATOR: The archives contain a draft of a positive response to this request sent by Beria to Molotov, but the Allies themselves never received anything. 

NIKITA PETROV (HISTORIAN—ONG MEMORIAL): It is clear that the ultimate decision-maker was above Molotov and Beria. It was Stalin himself. If Stalin had decided to tell the Allies everything—even to show them or hand over the body—it would have been done. But Stalin decided that no information should be released. 

NICOLAY VLADIMIRTSEV (HISTORIAN AT THE RUSSIAN NATIONAL ARCHIVES): Why was this collaboration refused? It is a question of high politics that should have been put to Stalin himself—and for which we will never find a clear and precise answer. 

NARRATOR: The lie spread around the world and became fodder for the tabloid press.  We see Hitler everywhere, in every corner of the globe, along with those nostalgic for the regime.  Nazis are taking advantage of this to sow doubt.  Hitler is not dead. He will return to save Greater Germany. 

Of all the legends, there is one that particularly exasperates the British. The Soviets are now accusing the British of having facilitated Hitler’s escape and of keeping him hidden somewhere in their own occupation zone in order to use him one day against their Soviet ally. 

To put an end to this insulting accusation, a young British historian, Hughes Trevor-Roper, is tasked with investigating Hitler’s fate.  The Russians refuse to cooperate and deny all access to the Chancellery area under their control. But Trevor-Roper tracks down and interviews numerous witnesses to the final moments in the bunker in the Anglo-American prisoner-of-war camps.  Within a few weeks, he was convinced. Hitler did indeed commit suicide shortly after noon on April 30, and his body was burned by his guards. His report was convincing, but he had no direct evidence—no body.  This, therefore, is not enough to stop the ever-increasing and increasingly far-fetched rumors. 

For years, the FBI receives thousands of reports of Hitler’s whereabouts from around the world, which it must verify and file away. 

March 1953.  It was a global shock. Stalin is dead. The leader of world communism, the bloodthirsty dictator, the victor of World War II, the ruthless tyrant, the leader both adored and hated—has disappeared. And no one knows what the future holds for the regime of terror that he managed to impose for nearly 30 years in the Soviet Union. On Red Square, Beria has the honor of delivering the eulogies—the head of the secret police who hopes to rise to the highest office, but who, before the end of the year, will be executed with a bullet to the back of the neck in a KGB basement. The disappearance of two of his main executioners, a few months apart, may mark the end of fear for the Soviet people—and for Elena, who still holds one of Stalin’s secrets. 

IOURI KAGAN (BROTHER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA):  After Stalin’s death, beginning in 1953, Elena broke free. She began to speak, telling us what had happened and how she had been involved in the events in Berlin in ’45.  But she couldn’t prove anything. 

NARRATOR: All the secrets of a criminal regime lie on those countless, completely inaccessible shelves. Ten years later, the truth about Hitler’s death remains hidden in archives that no one has the right to access and in the memories of only a handful of surviving witnesses. 

LIOUBOV SUMM (GRANDDAUGHTER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA): Elena was able to publish a short story that ends with these words: “During those days in the bunker beneath the Chancellery, Hitler committed suicide.” So, I asked her—since it was no longer a secret—if it was okay to say that he had committed suicide. “Could you talk about it?” I asked. She said: “Yes, since the true cause of his death remained unknown, we were allowed to say that he had committed suicide by taking poison or shooting himself in the head. We could also make up a story that he escaped to Argentina, disguised as a woman.” 

NARRATOR: In Moscow, in 1955, Elena was allowed to say and write that Hitler had committed suicide, but not more. But it was still impossible to recount the investigation, the identification of the remains, and even less so Stalin’s lie.  Anyway, who would believe her? Where’s the evidence? Among the many versions of Hitler’s disappearance, the suicide theory is now the one favored by those in power, but not just any suicide. 

RUDOLF PIKHOYA (HISTORIAN, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE ARCHIVES COMMITTEE): The idea that Hitler poisoned himself is much more interesting for propaganda purposes than if he had shot himself in the head.  Suicide by gunshot is an act of courage, whereas taking poison is a sign of cowardice. 

NARRATOR: There was the first lie told by Stalin himself.  Hitler is alive and managed to escape. Then, a half-truth gradually took its place.  Hitler ultimately committed suicide—but by poisoning himself like a coward. 

RUDOLF PIKHOYA (HISTORIAN, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE ARCHIVES COMMITTEE): This legend would be repeated and regurgitated until it became completely impossible to dispel the lie. 

NARRATOR: 1965, 20 years after the event, Brezhnev. For the first time since the end of the war, the Soviet leadership decided to commemorate the victory. 

RUDOLF PIKHOYA (HISTORIAN, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE ARCHIVES COMMITTEE): When Leonid Brezhnev, a true war veteran, became head of state, little by little, a window began to open, allowing for the study of the history of the war.  And it was at that moment that a small—though very limited. 

IOURI KAGAN (BROTHER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA): The opportunity for publication also arose for researchers to mark the 20th anniversary of the end of the war. Can you believe it—20 years have already passed? So, in 1965, Elena decided to write a true historical work. How events unfolded, what the intelligence services managed to accomplish. 

NARRATOR: Elena is now a respected writer. But the story of Hitler’s death—or rather, the story of the lie surrounding Hitler’s death—obsesses her, and she is determined to tell it at all costs. For her account to be irrefutable and to put an end to the legends, it must be based on the evidence hidden in the archives. After numerous requests, she finally obtained permission to enter the off-limits building—a strictly supervised visit for a very limited time. So, Elena frantically copied all the documents brought to her. 

LIOUBOV SUMM (GRANDDAUGHTER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA): She filled five large notebooks. She wasn’t the one doing the research, and she didn’t know what was kept in those archives. There was no catalog, and she couldn’t wander through the shelves to choose what she wanted either. She had to remain seated at her desk, and an officer would bring her one file after another. What matters is the interest in the documents varied widely. One day, she opened a file containing a list of various trophies sent from Berlin to Moscow: Hitler’s coat, a paper doll recovered from the bunker.  And on the list, among the objects, were the names of Käthe Heusermann and several other Germans.  That’s how my grandmother learned that Kate had been sent to Moscow as an object. 

NARRATOR: It was a huge shock. Elena suddenly found herself transported 20 years back in time to Berlin, in the interrogation room of the Soviet General Staff.  Käthe Heusermann, Hitler’s dentist’s assistant, was the key witness who helped identify the monster’s remains. The cheerful young woman with whom Elena had bonded— Käthe—whom the Soviet secret service would not release. 

INGEBORG HILLS (NIECE OF KÄTHE HEUSERMANN) READING FROM KÄTHE’S UNPUBLISHED MEMOIRS: “On July 29, 1945, at 6 a.m., I was transported by truck with seven other prisoners to the Berlin airport, and we boarded a cargo plane bound for Moscow.  Upon arrival, we were immediately crammed into a salad bowl and taken to solitary confinement at the Lubyanka Prison. My cell was very small, seven paces long, and water was seeping from the black-painted walls.” 

LIOUBOV SUMM (GRANDDAUGHTER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA): She does not understand how long they will keep her or why she has not been charged with any crime. She is completely baffled by her situation and the reason for her imprisonment. 

INGEBORG HILLS (NIECE OF KÄTHE HEUSERMANN) READING FROM KÄTHE’S UNPUBLISHED MEMOIRS: “I remained in solitary confinement for six years, and in August ‘51, I was charged.  I was accused of helping the bourgeois system prolong the war by participating in dental care of Hitler. During the sessions, I should have killed Hitler—for example, by smashing a water bottle over his head? And in doing so, I would have saved the world.” 

NARRATOR: Six years of solitary confinement in KGB prisons. And then suddenly, in August 1951, an absurd accusation and a conviction without trial. 

What happened was that one month earlier, Abakouov, the former head of SMERSH, who had become Minister of State Security and was Stalin’s protégé, fell abruptly from grace and was arrested. 

NIKITA PETROV (HISTORIAN—ONG MEMORIAL): In 1951, when Abakouov was arrested, it was discovered that there were a number of Germans—witnesses to Hitler’s death—who were being held without even having arrest warrants issued. So, a list was drawn up, and Stalin was asked what should be done with them.  The decision was to convict them; they were all sentenced to many years in prison— on trumped up political charges—that way, no one would say anything and everything would be in order. 

INGEBORG HILLS (NIECE OF KÄTHE HEUSERMANN) READING FROM KÄTHE’S UNPUBLISHED MEMOIRS: “I was sentenced to 10 years in a maximum-security labor camp in Siberia. But they took into account the six and a half years I had already served. I signed my sentence. I was glad to be going to a camp with fellow sufferers and to escape from my stone tomb in Moscow.” 

NARRATOR: In December 1951, Käthe left Moscow for Siberia in a cattle car.  She was given back the small suitcase she’d packed in Berlin for her summer trip to Europe, when she’d planned to be away for a week.  The journey lasted 14 days, and Käthe recounts that whenever a prisoner died of cold or hunger, the guards would open the train car door and throw the body into the snow. 

LIOUBOV SUMM (GRANDDAUGHTER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA): Käthe writes that the work quota was very high. “I couldn’t meet it. At the time, I didn’t even weigh 40 kg. I was never able to meet that quota. And as punishment, I was deprived of part of my food rations. I wasn’t allowed anything in the morning or at night, only in the middle of the day. If I hadn’t had a good friend who worked hard and shared her rations with me, I would have starved to death.” 

NIKITA PETROV (HISTORIAN—ONG MEMORIAL): Why were the witnesses to Hitler’s death kept in prison until 1955 or 1956?  What was the dentist’s assistant guilty of—she was imprisoned and sentenced like so many others? Why were they arrested by the KGB? Why did they serve such long sentences?  

LIOUBOV SUMM (GRANDDAUGHTER OF ELENA RZHEVSKAYA): Käthe Heusermann was convicted as a witness to Hitler’s death. She was imprisoned in the Soviet Union so that her testimony would not prevent this historical fact from being concealed. She suffered because of the service she rendered to history. 

NARRATOR: First a secret prisoner, then convicted of a fabricated crime, she was detained until that day in 1955 when her 10-year sentence was fully served.  Then her status suddenly changed. 

INGEBORG HILLS (NIECE OF KÄTHE HEUSERMANN) READING FROM KÄTHE’S UNPUBLISHED MEMOIRS: “We arrived in Moscow on June 1 and were taken on a bus tour of the city. We were shown the Kremlin, the university, and particularly the metro, whose stations are all decorated in different artistic styles with mosaics, paintings, and marble.” 

NIKITA PETROV (HISTORIAN—ONG MEMORIAL): The German prisoner of war sentenced to 25 years or a little less goes from being a prisoner of the Soviet Union to a foreign tourist; all of a sudden, he becomes a free man or woman waiting for the moment to return to his homeland—so why not give him a tour of Moscow so he can leave as a friend of the Soviet Union, and then he can say, “Here is the kindness of the communists.”  “Yes, we threw you in prison for 10 years, but now you’re a friend—almost a brother.” “Go on leave!” 

NARRATOR: Käthe returns to Germany by express train with a sleeper car, white sheets, and a lampshade all to yourself. In the Soviet Union, tourists are required to spend all their foreign currency before leaving the country along with their few rubles. So, the men in the convoy buy Crimean champagne in the dining car and leave the change as a tip for the waiters. 

By 1950, nearly 2 million German prisoners had been repatriated from the Soviet Union. And by 1955, only a few thousand prisoners remained in Siberia. Käthe is among the very last. 

Upon arriving in Hanover, she called her sister. Her 19-year-old niece answered the phone. 

INGEBORG HILLS (NIECE OF KÄTHE HEUSERMANN): Yes, that’s right. Exactly. I was home alone, completely distraught. What should I do? What should I do?  I have to go to the train station. I recognized her right away. She hadn’t changed that much.  It was I, on the contrary, who must have grown up over all those years. 

NARRATOR: For eight years, Käthe’s family knew nothing of what had happened to her.  It was only two years earlier that a fellow camp inmate, who had just been released, was able to inform her brother and sister that she was alive and in Siberia.  But the husband whose return she had awaited in Berlin in May ’45—he was the one who had grown tired of waiting.  Käthe had been declared dead, and her husband had remarried. 

INGEBORG HILLS (NIECE OF KÄTHE HEUSERMANN): She immediately adapted to her new life.  Soon, she told us with great determination: “Well, that chapter of my life is over. Now I’m starting a new life. I’m not a woman whose husband is away. I am… I have no idea what I am.”  It’s true—what are you when you’ve been declared dead?  Dead. I don’t know what they’d call that. 

NARRATOR: Elena’s book was published to mark the 20th anniversary of the end of the war. It wasn’t without its difficulties. It had to pass through a double layer of censorship: the usual, standard censorship that every book undergoes in the Soviet Union, and then a more exceptional form of censorship by the KGB.  The security service didn’t make too much of a fuss but refused to let Elena write that she had been authorized to consult KGB archives. Her book is therefore still not a historical document based on archival evidence, but once again a work of fiction in which Elena is not allowed to mention secrets or lies either.  So, we must wait another 25 years. 

In 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed, and in front of the Lubyanka building, the statue of Dzerzhinsky—the founder of the GPU, the predecessor of the KGB—was dismantled. 

Will we finally be able to learn and tell the truth about a country and a regime that no longer exist?  

SERGEY MIRONENKO (HISTORIAN—FORMER DIRECTOR OF THE RUSSIAN STATE ARCHIVE): When I became director of the State Archives of our National Archives in 1992, there was a sort of handover of power. My predecessor handed me a cardboard box containing fragments of Hitler’s skull and the documents from the investigation into his death.  It was only after the collapse of the Soviet Union that what has been called the “archives revolution” could begin. Millions—and I mean millions—of documents were declassified, and, in fact, they are now accessible to researchers.  

NICOLAY VLADIMIRTSEV (HISTORIAN AT THE RUSSIAN NATIONAL ARCHIVES): Here are fragments of the sofa on which Hitler ended his life, bearing traces of his blood. These pieces were dismantled and brought here along with the investigation documents. They were seen only at the time of the investigation, then kept under wraps until 1992 in our national archives. 

NARRATOR: So, there are the investigation files, pieces of physical evidence, and fragments of Hitler’s skull at the National Archives, while the KGB archives—now part of the FSB—secretly held some of the prisoners’ testimonies, including that of Käthe Heusermann, as well as the main piece of evidence: Hitler’s teeth. 

But where are the bodies—the charred remains of Hitler, Eva Braun, and the Goebbels family?  

NIKITA PETROV (HISTORIAN—ONG MEMORIAL): The remains were attached to the General Staff of the 3rd Army, stationed in eastern Germany. And they moved along with the regiment’s changing assignments. With each move, a new secret location had to be found to bury them. 

NARRATOR: In 1970, Andropov, the head of the KGB, asked Brezhnov to put an end to these charred remains that had been following the 3rd Army for 25 years.  The secret document detailing the destruction of the Nazi leaders’ bodies was discovered in the archives in 1992, bringing the matter to a close. 47 years later, all the evidence of Hitler’s suicide by gunshot in his bunker shortly after noon on April 30, 1945, has finally been gathered and revealed. 

SERGEY MIRONENKO (HISTORIAN—FORMER DIRECTOR OF THE RUSSIAN STATE ARCHIVE): Nothing can be hidden. Everything eventually comes to light. Everyone should learn this lesson from history. Even the best-hidden truth eventually resurfaces. 

NIKITA PETROV (HISTORIAN—ONG MEMORIAL): Those in power never thought it necessary to explain themselves to society. In the 1990s, Russian leaders said, ‘All right, all of that was hidden, but it was the Soviet Union that hid it.’ A general verdict should have been reached regarding the Soviet period and the Soviet regime as a power based on violence that violated its own laws, but this judgment on the past and on Soviet communist crimes was never handed down.

 

REFERENCES 

Karner, Stefan. Im Archipel GUPVI: Kriegsgefangenschaft und Internierung in der Sowjetunion, 1941-1956. Munich: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1995. 

Moorhouse, Roger. Berlin at War: Life and Death in Hitler’s Capital 1939-1945.  Basic Books. New York, 2010. 

Mort d’Hitler, l’histoire d’un secret d’État. Directors: Nina Beliaeva and Jean-Pierre Bozon, broadcast in 2016/2017 by RMC Découverte and Betula Productions. 

Rzhevskaya, Elena. Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter: From the Battle of Rzhev to Hitler’s Bunker. Greenhill Books. London, 2018.

 

POST 186: THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN A GERMAN “DENTIST” AND A GERMAN “ZAHNARZT” AND WHAT IT TELLS US ABOUT HITLER’S DENTIST AND HITLER’S FATE

Note: In this post I consider the differences between a German “dentist” and a German “Zahnarzt,” both of which confusingly translate into English as dentist. This provides an opportunity to assess the dental work that Dr. Hugo Blaschke, Hitler’s dentist, performed on him. Though bestowed with the title of “Doctor” by Hitler, Blaschke was nothing more than an unlicensed practitioner and his dental techniques a reflection of his “old-fashioned” work, work that Blaschke’s ever-present dental assistant, Käthe Heusermann, was easily able to identify for the Russians immediately after WWII ended. As my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck’s former dental assistant, Käthe confided her knowledge of Hitler’s fate to him, a fate that many conspiracy theorists have ever since tried to refute.

 

Related Posts:

POST 17: SURVIVING IN BERLIN IN THE TIME OF HITLER: MY UNCLE FEDOR’S STORY

POST 31: WITNESS TO HISTORY, “PROOF” OF HITLER’S DEATH IN MY UNCLE FEDOR’S OWN WORDS

POST 40: ELISABETH “LISA” PAULY NEE KRUGER, ONE OF MY UNCLE FEDOR’S “SILENT HEROES “

 

Coming from a line of distinguished and accomplished dentists, including some with riveting life stories, I thought I would explain to readers a distinction between a so-called German “dentist” and a German “Zahnarzt.” This is a distinction that did not formally exist in America as it did in Germany. However, if readers watched some of the same American westerns I did as a child, they may recall scenes in which so-called “barber-surgeons” performed dental extractions. They were equipped with tools for shaving and cutting, utensils that could also be used for pulling teeth. This practice was common due to the lack of specialized dentists and the barber’s access to sharp implements. Similar “specialists” also performed dental work in Germany though under a more formal structure as I will explain.

But I’m getting ahead of my skis. My interest in exploring this topic stems from something I will explain before discussing the differences between a “dentist” and a “Zahnarzt.” My uncle, known in Germany as Dr. Fedor Bruck, has been the subject of multiple earlier posts. In Post 31, I discussed my uncle’s understanding of Adolf Hitler’s fate and how he obtained such knowledge as the Nazi regime collapsed, and the Russians encircled and captured the Reichstag and Reich Chancellery where Hitler was hiding and ultimately killed himself.

Below I will not only discuss the “dentiste” (plural) and “Zahnärzte” (plural) but I will also weave in some of what my uncle had to say on some of the topics discussed.

Following the forced closure of his dental practice in Liegnitz, Germany (today: Legnica, Poland) after Hitler’s ascension to power in 1933, my uncle decamped for Berlin hoping to lose himself in the anonymity of a larger city and work under the auspices of an Aryan dentist. My uncle’s dental assistant in Liegnitz was a non-Jew named Käthe Heusermann (Figure 1), a well-known personage historically. She followed my uncle to Berlin perhaps because they were romantically involved. Regardless, Käthe wound up being hired by Hitler’s dentist, Dr. Hugo Blaschke (Figure 2), as his dental assistant. This is significant because Käthe was always in attendance when Dr. Blaschke performed dental work at the Reichstag or on the Obersalzberg estate on Hitler, who incidentally was known to be deathly afraid of having dental work done. Käthe’s presence on these occasions meant she was intimately familiar with and recognized Dr. Blaschke’s distinctive and, as it happens, “old-fashioned” dental work. This would become significant following the discovery of Hitler’s presumed skeletal and cranial remains shortly after the Russians occupied the Reichstag and Käthe’s positive identification of his dental jaws.

 

Figure 1. Käthe Heusermann with my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck in his dental office in Liegnitz

 

Figure 2. Adolf Hitler’s dentist, Dr. Hugo Blaschke

 

On this topic my uncle wrote the following: 

The main person in this connection is Mrs. Käthe Heusermann, née Reiss regarding whom I must mention more details, because of the importance attached to her in this matter.  She was born in 1909, and I trained her as a dental assistant in my office in Liegnitz, Silesia, in the year 1926.  She practiced in this profession until 1945, for at least 15 years.  Over this time, she worked with me for three-and-a-half years, and from 1937 on, that is for over eight years, she worked with Blaschke, Hitler’s dentist.  She quickly advanced to the position of first assistant, and, during the last years, she was mostly present during Hitler’s treatments, whether they took place in the Reich Chancellery or on the Obersalzberg estate.  She was very much interested in her profession and possessed great experience.  She had the special gift to remember very well the peculiarities of the patients’ mouths . . .” 

As I explained in Post 17 my uncle Fedor Bruck miraculously managed to survive underground in Berlin during the entire war. He hid in greenways and was occasionally sheltered by non-Jewish family members. Also, with the help of Otto Berger, a man later bestowed the honorary title of “Righteous Among the Nations,” he even managed to obtain false identity papers in the name of Dr. Friedrich Burkhardt, a name matching his own initials. His earlier relationship with Käthe Heusermann meant she also hid him on occasion, likely at great personal risk. Based on my uncle’s own account, it is clear he was in regular contact with Käthe during his time underground. My uncle came in search of Käthe shortly after Berlin was captured by the Russians: 

“On April 26, 1945, Steglitz, in the southwestern part of the city [Berlin], was occupied by the Russians.  Behind the advancing troops, I arrived, on May 4th, in the apartment of my former assistant Käthe Heusermann.  This apartment was situated at Pariserstrasse 39-40 near Kurfürstendamm.  A friendship of twenty years tied my person and the family of Käthe HeusermannKäthe was alone in the bomb-damaged apartment and was very upset and confused.  She had only returned to her apartment the day before, May 3rd, having spent the time before that in the Air Shelter in the Reich Chancellery.” 

The problem with understanding and explaining to an English-speaking audience the difference between a “dentist” and a “Zahnarzt” is that both words translate into English as “dentist.” The primary bibliographic reference discussing the differences between the two is written in German, so constant reference back to the original German text is necessary to accurately understand and explain the distinctions. I will attempt to do so along with providing some historical background. 

The primary source of the information for the following discussion comes from an article written in 2015 by a gentleman named Dr. Dominik Groß for a German magazine named “ZM (Zahnärztlichen Mitteilungen).” Coincidentally, several years ago I was contacted by Dr. Groß in connection with a “Lexikon,” an encyclopedia, he was developing on Jewish dentists persecuted during the Nazi period for which he requested information on my father and uncle. Conveniently, I was able to communicate with Dr. Groß while writing this post to have him explain certain nuances, though I take full responsibility for any misinterpretations. 

According to Dr. Groß, as recently as the mid-19th century, there were few Zahnärzte in Germany; in 1850, it is estimated that no more than 250 of them were registered in the German states that in 1872 became the German Empire, 103 of which practiced in Prussia, the largest of the states. For ease, I will alternately refer to Zahnärzte as “pure” or licensed dentists. The key reason for the slow development of the profession was the existence of so-called “contemporary surgeons,” basically non-academic surgeons working at the same time who performed dental treatments. 

The “Prussian Medical Regulations” did not list pure dentists as medical practitioners until 1825. At the time, to stand for the dental examination, someone who was not a physician or surgeon had to provide evidence of having attended lectures on anatomy, general and special surgery, operative theory, pharmacology, and surgical clinical practice. Regulations from 1836 supplemented these requirements. However, the only educational prerequisite was a “tertiary” entrance qualification from a grammar school, a “Gymnasium.” This would have been the equivalent to the completion in Germany of the so-called “Obertertia” (Latin) (Upper Tertia), corresponding to the ninth grade in United States, thus students as young as 15 or 16! 

Astonishingly, it wasn’t until 1909, 73 years later, that the so-called “Abitur” became a prerequisite for studying dentistry. In the United States, the Abitur is most closely comparable to a combination of a high school diploma and a college transcript, specifically from a college preparatory program, and potentially including Advanced Placement (AP) or International Baccalaureate (IB) courses. Suffice it to say, there is no direct equivalent been an Abitur and a single U.S. degree or certificate. 

In 1869, Prussia enacted new dental examination regulations requiring completion of the 12th -13th grades and two years of university education; however, unlike medical students, they were classified as “immature” meaning not regularly enrolled students because they did not have a university entrance qualification, a so-called “Matura,” closely equivalent to an Abitur. As I understand, even today, medical practitioners in Germany tend to look down on Zahnärzte, no doubt a relic of the past and the disparate educational requirements. 

As Dr. Groß notes, “At the time, there were other dental practitioners besides [pure] dentists who had not undergone regular training. Although lay practitioners had been explicitly banned from practicing dentistry in Prussia since 1825 (a ‘courier ban’), unlicensed practitioners repeatedly attempted to practice dentistry, particularly in regions where there was no strict control. They were often disparagingly referred to as ‘quacks’ by the contemporary dental profession, and in fact, these practitioners generally possessed low qualifications: quite a few had originally worked as barbers or bath attendants before later shifting their attention to the treatment of dental diseases. Other unlicensed dental practitioners had gained experience in skilled trades such as instrument makers, goldsmith, or mechanics and then specialized in the manufacture and insertion of dentures. In addition, dentistry was originally also practiced by ‘wandering healers’ who appeared as tooth breakers, traveling journeymen or market criers—but by the 19th century at the latest, these had clearly lost importance.” 

Without getting too lost in the weeds, the so-called Trade Regulation Act was enacted into law in October 1869 in the Northern German Federation, the core territory of what would later become the German Empire. This law basically liberalized medicine and astonishingly stipulated that henceforth anyone would be permitted to practice medicine, although the use of medical titles was dependent on proof of qualification. As Groß notes, “It soon became apparent that the introduction of lay treatment was causing enormous damage to the reputation of licensed practitioners.” 

Following liberalization of medicine, the total number of practitioners grew exponentially. Dentistry was particularly affected. By 1890, there were three unlicensed practitioners for every pure dentist. The majority soon called themselves “dental artists.” To cement their newly found legal standing, they organized themselves into powerful interest groups. In 1880, this resulted in the establishment of the first central organization of unlicensed dental practitioners, the “Association of German Dental Artists” (VdZ), to more effectively counter attacks by licensed dentists. Striving to demonstrate a standardization of training, the dental artists established the first “Dental Technical Training Institute” in Berlin, a hallmark of which became holding of final examinations for dental artists. 

Though dental artists became increasingly better organized, as Dr. Groß notes, they were a diverse lot: “. . .at the beginning of the 20th century, non-licensed dental practitioners still represented a very heterogeneous group. Statistics published in 1909 show that only 31.4 percent of 1,060 non-licensed practitioners examined could prove that they had completed a regular apprenticeship as a dental artist. 58.4 percent had previously worked as barbers, and a further 10.2 percent had no professional training whatsoever. But even the trained dental artists did not provide evidence of a uniform apprenticeship period. In any case, many of their statements were difficult to verify. The quantitative importance of dental artists, however, was undisputed: their number rose from 735 to 6,171 between 1878 and 1909/10, a more than eightfold increase. In contrast, in 1909/10, only 2,667 [pure] dentists were registered.” 

The liberalization of dentistry was opposed by the dental profession from the outset. To obfuscate matters, many unlicensed practitioners, contrary to the provisions of the 1869 Trade Regulation Act, adopted professional titles ranging from “dental artist” to “dental surgeon” to “specialist for dental sufferers” to “dentist.” Dental organizations filed complaints against every professed misappropriation of titles to no avail. 

According to Dr. Groß, the issue about professional titles became even more contentious when dubious U.S. institutes began selling the title of “Doctor of Dental Surgery” (D.D.S.) to German dental practitioners. Many dental artists acquired these sham diplomas without proving they were professionally qualified, nor even without traveling stateside. As the dispute intensified, Prussia issued a decree in 1897 requiring all future foreign doctorates awarded to be approved. 

This did not resolve the problem as unlicensed practitioners had already switched to using the professional title “dentist.” Pure dentists indignantly countered that according to Latin and Anglo-Saxon usage the terms “dentiste” and “dentist” respectively referred to a licensed dentist and vehemently opposed the use of the title “dentist” by unlicensed practitioners. Nevertheless, an expert in foreign languages concluded that “. . .someone who calls themselves a dentist is a dental technician practicing a free trade, who does not claim a title and is not entitled to one. Those who claim and are entitled to the title and who have passed an exam are Zahnärzte or, depending on their university, doctors of dental practice. Therefore, neither foreigners nor nationals can confuse a Zahnarzt with a dentist.” 

With this favorable expert opinion, in 1908 the “Association of German Dental Artists” renamed their organization the “Association of Dentists in the German Empire.” In the ensuing years the term “dentist” entered common parlance despite protests from Zahnärzte. It would take until 1952 for what Dr. Groß refers to as the “dualism in dentistry” to be overcome and for practicing “dentiste” (plural) to be integrated into the dental profession. 

The reason I’ve gone to such lengths to explain the distinction between a “dentist” and a “Zahnarzt” relates to Hitler’s dentist, Dr. Hugo Blaschke. His Wikipedia entry tells us that he studied dentistry in Berlin and at the University of Pennsylvania and trained as a “dental surgeon” in London before opening his own practice in late 1911. Dr. Groß’s article hints that Blaschke’s training as a dental surgeon meant he was a “dentist,” not a “Zahnarzt.” His title, though, implies he was a “Zahnarzt.” Dr. Groß explained, however, that Hitler bestowed the honorary title of doctorate on Blaschke and that he was in fact a “dentist,” an unlicensed practitioner. 

My uncle also addressed this point: 

“. . .He [Blaschke] studied at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia before the first World War, from which he graduated.  Since he had not passed any examination in Germany, he was only rated a dental technician there.  Having joined the [Nazi] Party early, he had a membership number below 40,000.  He had already treated Hitler before 1933.  Upon a decree by Goebbels, he was awarded the title of dentist, without having to pass any examination, and was later given the professor title by Hitler.  His knowledge was that of an average dentist . . .”

Ever since Hitler committed suicide in the Reichstag or the Reich Chancellery, conspiracy theorists have nonsensically speculated that he escaped to South America. The empirical evidence suggests otherwise. Let me review some of what I discussed in Post 31 again quoting from my uncle’s own words. (I recommend readers read Post 31 in tandem with the current post to get a fuller picture.) 

Regarding the outmoded dental work Käthe recognized as the work of Dr. Blaschke, she told the Russians the following upon being questioned by them: 

“On a front tooth there was a so-called rim-crown, furthermore there was a cut-off bridge in his mouth, since the molar, which would have served as support, had to be removed.  She gave them more details regarding some crowns and other treatments . . .She furthermore declared that the written data regarding Hitler’s treatments were kept in a box which was either still at the Chancellery, or which Blaschke had taken with him to Obersalzberg. 

Let me attempt to explain this to readers. 

A “cut-off bridge” in dentistry, also known as a cantilever bridge, means the bridge is only anchored on one side. Instead of having crowns on extant teeth adjacent to the gap on both sides, a cantilever bridge utilizes a crown on only one side to support the replacement tooth (pontic). Cantilever bridges are designed for situations where there are teeth available for support on only one side of the gap. This means the pontic, the replacement tooth, is essentially “hanging” off the single supporting tooth. 

After doing some research on the question of rim crown usage on front teeth, I conclude based on what my uncle wrote that this is not the most common or ideal choice for anterior restorations. The primary concern with rim crowns on front teeth is their aesthetic impact. The thickness of the crown material can sometimes result in a less natural and bulkier appearance, especially if the original tooth requires minimal reduction. Porcelain, ceramic, and zirconia crowns, which offer a more natural, translucent appearance that blends with adjacent teeth, are usually preferred for front teeth restorations. 

The significance from my point of view of Dr. Blaschke’s use of a cut-off bridge and a rim crown on Hitler’s front teeth is that they would easily have been recognizable by Käthe given her involvement and presence when Hitler was having dental work done. They reinforce the belief that the jaws found in the Reichstag were those of Hitler. In my uncle’s words: 

“. . .The peculiarities of Hitler’s jaws are very extraordinary ones.  Rim-crowns are seen very rarely only, since present-day dentists do not make them any longer, and cut-off bridges are not frequent either . . . 

I had pointed out to correspondents a rim-crown as being ‘old-fashioned’ which, because of its comparative rarity, necessarily constituted an important factor [in the identification of Hitler’s jaws]. 

The fact that Dr. Blaschke knowingly performed ‘old-fashioned work’ on ‘his Führer,’ seems to me, as expert, rather ridiculous.  On the other hand, he does not owe his title of professor, nor his various other titles, to the fact that he was an ace in his profession, but only to the fact that he was a faithful Nazi having a party membership number somewhere around 36,000 . . . 

Käthe Heusermann suggested that my uncle apply to the Russians to take over Dr. Blaschke’s intact dental office, which he was eligible to do as a surviving dentist; Dr. Blaschke’s office was in the Russian occupation zone and my uncle was granted permission to take possession of his premises located at Kurfürstendamm 213 (Figure 3), as postwar Berlin address directories confirm. (Figure 4)

 

Figure 3. Entrance of Dr. Blaschke’s dental office building as it looks today, located at Kurfürstendamm 213, Berlin

 

Figure 4. Page from a 1946 Berlin phone directory showing the name and address of my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck’s dental practice at Kurfürstendamm 213

 

Following my uncle’s occupancy of Dr. Blaschke’s dental office, as I noted in Post 31, events took place that seemed to confirm Hitler’s fate. Quoting again from my uncle: 

Then, during the days following . . . happenings took place which I believe to be proof that Hitler actually died.  On Wednesday, May 9th, 1945, I met a Russian Lieutenant Colonel in the building, as well as woman in uniform and a gentleman in mufti, as they inquired from the Superintendent as to the whereabouts of Blaschke.  As I learned later, they were the deputy military governor of Berlin, a female agent of the Russian secret police, and a certain Doctor Arnaudow, who had been assistant at the Berlin Charité with “Geheimrat Sauerbruch” [“Geheimrat Sauerbruch” is a successful and respected physician].  The latter was a Bulgarian and had brought the Russians who were looking for Hitler’s dentist . . .; furthermore, he acted as interpreter, although the agent of the Russian Secret Police, who called herself ‘Lola,’ spoke a little German. 

I think “Lola,” as I implied in Post 31, was a 26-year-old Jewish woman named Elena Rzhevskaya, born Elena Moiseyevna Kagan in Belarus in 1919. She was traveling with the Soviet vanguard when they entered the center of Berlin on April 29, 1945. She was a military interpreter for SMERSH, the Soviet counter-intelligence agency. As the Soviet forces advanced through Berlin, Rzhevskaya’s unit was tasked with finding people who could provide information on Hitler’s whereabouts. 

The Soviets predictably showed up at Blaschke’s dental office, now occupied by my uncle, shortly after he took possession of the premises. My uncle was asked to get Käthe. She was taken away and questioned by the Soviets. Upon her return two days later, she related to my uncle what had transpired during her questioning: 

“First of all, they asked that she give as detailed as possible a description of Hitler’s teeth, with pertinent sketches.  Then she was shown a number of skulls and parts of jaws, on which there was still some flesh, which in some instances were charred or burned.  Among these, she definitely recognized the jaws of Hitler, with the aid of the details written down, and the peculiarities she had noted.  One jaw, which contained a bridge made from Palapont (i.e., artificial colophonium on a colloidal base), was identified as that of Eva Braun, who had received this bridge only a few weeks previously.  She declared, upon questioning that the technical work had been done by Fritz Echtmann, Blaschke’s technician.  This fact most probably was the reason for later on picking up Fritz Echtmann. 

During the entire time, the Russians took down in writing the proceedings, which Käthe had to sign on each page.  She also had to swear that she would not speak of the identification of the remains of Hitler, until the Russian Press and the Radio would have published same.  Lola, of whom Käthe only had heard . . . that she was an agent of the Russian Secret Service, said to her ‘Mrs. Käthe, you will be a very famous woman, you are the only person who not only knows, but also can prove that Hitler is really dead’ 

In the current environment of vast misinformation and disinformation, it’s unrealistic to believe that hard evidence will convince conspiracy theorists that Hitler killed himself in the Reichstag but such are the facts. 

REFERENCES 

Groß, D. (2015 Oct 31). Der Dentist setzt sich durch. ZM (Zahnärztlichen Mitteilungen) (21/2015).

https://www.zm-online.de/artikel/2015/falsches-spiel-oder-sinnhafte-neue-regel/der-dentist-setzt-sich-durch

Rzhevskaya, Elena. (2018) Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter: From the Battle of Rzhev to Hitler’s Bunker. Greenhill Books. London.

 

POST 84: MY UNCLE DR. FEDOR BRUCK’S FRIEND, WOLFRAM E. VON PANNWITZ, GERMAN BARON

Note: In this post, I discuss a German Baron my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck befriended in a displaced persons camp in West Berlin while awaiting passage to America in 1947, a gentleman with whom my uncle had much in common and who went on to parlay a small investment in the stock market into more than $500,000 by the time he died. I also review the circumstances that led my uncle to immigrate to the United States after spending 30 months in hiding in Berlin eluding the Nazis, then being permitted to take over Hitler’s dentist’s office following WWII.

 

Related Posts:

Post 17: Surviving in Berlin in The Time of Hitler: My Uncle Fedor’s Story

Post 31: Witness to History, “Proof” of Hitler’s Death in My Uncle Fedor’s Own Words

Post 40: Elisabeth “Lisa” Pauly née Krüger, One of My Uncle Fedor’s “Silent Heroes”

Post 41: Dr. Otto Berger & Other “Silent Heroes” Who Helped My Uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck Survive the Nazi Regime

 

Figure 1. My Uncle Fedor in his dental office in Liegnitz, Prussia

 

My uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck has been the subject of multiple earlier posts which are among my most popular chronicles. I encourage interested readers to peruse these earlier written accounts to familiarize themselves with the broad outlines of my uncle’s life. For the purposes of this post, however, let me provide a brief review.

My uncle owned his own dental practice in Liegnitz, Germany [today: Legnica, Poland] (Figure 1), in the Prussian province of Silesia, until April 1936, when he was forced to shutter his business by the Nazis. He relocated to Berlin, where he was able to resume work for a time, initially working for himself (Figures 2a-b), then later working under the auspices of a non-Jewish dentist. In October 1942, my uncle was ordered by the Nazi authorities to report to an age transport; realizing this meant deportation to a concentration camp and eventual death, he went into hiding. With the help of non-Jewish relatives and acquaintances, “silent heroes,” my uncle survived underground for 30 months until the fall of Berlin in early May 1945. It is estimated that fewer than 5,000 Jews survived concealment in Germany during WWII.

 

Figure 2a. Ancestry.com cover page for a 1937 Berlin Address Book listing for my Uncle Fedor, showing him as a “Zahnarzt,” dentist, with an office at Fasasenstrasse 20 in the Charlottenburg District of Berlin
Figure 2b. 1937 Berlin Address Book listing for my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 3. A young Käthe Heusermann née Reiss with my Uncle Fedor in his dental office in Liegnitz

 

When my uncle had his own dental practice in Liegnitz, one of his dental assistants was Käthe Heusermann née Reiss (Figure 3), a woman of some later recognition; after my uncle Fedor was forced to close his business, she too relocated to Berlin and wound up obtaining a similar position as dental assistant for Adolf Hitler’s American-trained dentist, Dr. Hugo Blaschke (Figure 4), an early member of the National Socialist party. As Dr. Blaschke’s assistant, Käthe Heusermann was always in attendance when der Führer had very distinctive yet outdated dental work performed on him at a special private office Dr. Blaschke was assigned in the Reich Chancellery; Dr. Blaschke’s private business office was located at Kurfürstendamm 213 in the district of  Charlottenburg, the boulevard considered the Champs-Élysées of Berlin; this building still stands today. (Figure 5)

 

Figure 4. Hitler’s American-trained dentist, Dr. Hugo Blaschke, an early member of the National Socialist Party
Figure 5. Entrance to Kurfürstendamm 213 in Charlottenburg, where Dr. Blaschke once had his dental practice that my Uncle Fedor took over after WWII, as it looks today

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As I explained to readers in Post 31, there is very clear evidence that because of their previous relationship and friendship Käthe Heusermann sheltered and hid my uncle for brief periods during his 30 months underground during WWII; she also gave him special rations and extra food vouchers she received as a member of the Führer’s extended staff, at great personal danger. Thus, throughout my uncle’s time in hiding during the war, he was periodically in touch with Käthe. This becomes relevant after the Russians occupied Berlin, and, by my uncle’s own account, he made his way to her apartment at Pariserstrasse 39-40 (Figures 6a-b):

“On April 26, 1945, Steglitz, in the southwestern part of the city [Berlin], was occupied by the Russians.  Behind the advancing troops, I arrived, on May 4th, in the apartment of my former assistant Käthe Heusermann. This apartment was situated at Pariserstrasse 39-40 near Kurfürstendamm. A friendship of twenty years tied my person and the family of Käthe Heusermann. Käthe was alone in the bomb-damaged apartment and was very upset and confused.  She had only returned to her apartment the day before, May 3rd, having spent the time before that in the Air Shelter in the Reich Chancellery.

 

Figure 6a. Ancestry.com cover page for a 1938 Berlin Address Book listing for my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck, interestingly showing him living at Pariserstrasse 39-40, where Käthe Heusermann also lived
Figure 6b. 1938 Berlin Address Book listing for my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Käthe Heusermann related the events to my uncle of what had occurred at the Reich Chancellery as the Allies encircled Berlin in the waning days of the war, and how Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun had committed suicide (see Post 31 for the complete account in my uncle’s words). Following the fall of Berlin, Käthe Heusermann advised my uncle to obtain permission from the pertinent authorities to take over Dr. Blaschke’s dental practice.  His dental office was intact, and Dr. Blaschke had already fled to Obersalzburg, so was unlikely to return. As a person persecuted by the Nazis, my uncle had a right to make this claim. The authorities did in fact grant my uncle permission to take over Dr. Blaschke’s apartment and practice at Kurfürstendamm 213 in Charlottenburg; as discussed in Post 17, post-WWII Address Directories from 1946 (Figure 7), 1947, and 1948 locate my uncle at this address. My uncle’s knowledge of the events surrounding Hitler’s fate stem primarily from his friendship with Käthe Heusermann, but also from his occupancy of Dr. Blaschke’s dental office following WWII.

 

Figure 7. 1946 Berlin Address Book listing for my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck, showing him as a dentist at Kurfürstendamm 213 in Charlottenburg, the former office of Hitler’s dentist, Dr. Hugo Blaschke

 

According to my uncle’s account, following his tenancy of Dr. Blaschke’s dental premises, he was visited on a few occasions by Russian counter-intelligence agents: 

. . .On Wednesday, May 9th, 1945, I met a Russian Lieutenant Colonel in the building, as well as woman in uniform and a gentleman in mufti, as they inquired from the Superintendent as to the whereabouts of Blaschke.  As I learned later, they were the deputy military governor of Berlin, a female agent of the Russian secret police, and a certain Doctor Arnaudow, who had been assistant at the Berlin Charité with “Geheimrat Sauerbruch” [“Geheimrat Sauerbruch” is a successful and respected physician].  The latter was a Bulgarian and had brought the Russians who were looking for Hitler’s dentist . . .; furthermore, he acted as interpreter, although the agent of the Russian Secret Police, who called herself “Lola,” spoke a little German.

 

Figure 8. Yelena Rzhevskaya in 1943, a military interpreter for SMERSH, the Soviet counter-intelligence agency

 

As I eventually learned, “Lola,” was a 26-year-old Jewish woman named Yelena Rzhevskaya (Figure 8), born Elena Moiseyevna Kagan in Belarus in 1919, who was travelling with the Soviet vanguard when they entered the center of Berlin on April 29, 1945. She was a military interpreter for SMERSH, the Soviet counter-intelligence agency. Like my uncle, she was a witness to events and findings about Hitler’s fate, corroborating much of what my uncle knew and later reported.  As the Soviet forces advanced through Berlin, Rzhevskaya’s unit was tasked with finding people who could provide information on Hitler’s whereabouts. It is only in 2018 that an English version of Yelena Rzhevskaya’s memoir, “Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter: From the Battle for Moscow to Hitler’s Bunker,” was published and that mention of her role in helping identify Hitler’s teeth was made.

Thus, in 1945, what led “Lola,” Yelena Rzhevskaya, to visit my uncle Fedor at Dr. Blaschke’s former dental offices was her search for information about Hitler’s fate. While questioning my uncle, Elena and the Russian authorities would learn about and eventually interrogate Käthe Heusermann and Fritz Echtmann, Blaschke’s dental technician, about their respective roles during Hitler’s dental procedures and their knowledge of his whereabouts; Käthe identified Hitler’s dental bridge for the Russians confirming his death, a fact the Soviets kept hidden for many years. Käthe and Fritz’s familiarity with Hitler’s fate would eventually result in both being abducted by the Russians and imprisoned in Russia until around 1955, a few years after Stalin died in March 1953. It served Stalin’s expansionist goals to have the world believe that Hitler had survived WWII and was an existential danger to the world, thus the need to remove from the scene anyone who could refute his narrative. It is precisely for this same reason that my uncle was in danger of being spirited away by the Russians, namely, because of his indirect knowledge of Hitler’s fate.

My uncle was alerted by the American post-war occupation forces who now controlled Charlottenburg, the Berlin district where Dr. Blaschke had once had his dental practice and where my uncle now lived and worked, that he was in danger of being snatched by the Russian intelligence services. Realizing they would eventually track him down wherever he hid and having already received a visa for the United States, my uncle abandoned his profession. Like my father, he would never again practice dentistry. Thus, began the next phase in my uncle’s life.

The precise date on which my uncle left Berlin is unknown to me. However, he wrote an affidavit in November 1966 in the matter of a probate hearing on behalf of the estate of Wolfram E. von Pannwitz, a German Baron he met in June 1947 in West Berlin, providing a general timeframe for when he departed Germany. My uncle and Mr. von Pannwitz befriended one another that month in a displaced persons camp where they had been assembled awaiting passage to the United States.  Both left for America on the 8th of July 1947 aboard the “Marine Marlin” from Bremen, Germany, and arrived in New York City on the 17th of July 1947 (Figures 9-10a-b); the two would remain friends until von Pannwitz died in New York City in 1966. (Figure 11)

 

Figure 9. “Alien Passenger Manifest” for the “Marine Marlin” with my uncle Fedor Bruck’s name showing he departed Bremen, Germany on July 8, 1947 and arrived in New York City on July 17, 1947

 

Figure 10a. Cover page for the Passenger List with Wolfram von Pannwitz’s name showing he traveled aboard the same ship and left at the same time from Bremen, Germany as my uncle
Figure 10b. Passenger List for the “Marine Marlin” with Wolfram von Pannwitz’s name showing he left Bremen, Germany the same date as my uncle, the 8th of July 1947

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 11. Wolfram E. von Pannwitz, far right, at my aunt and uncle’s wedding on March 4, 1958 in New York

 

Wolfram E. von Pannwitz was born on the 7th of July 1889 in Botzanowitz, Prussia [today: Bodzanowice, Poland], approximately 84 miles northeast of Leobschutz, Prussia [today: Głubczyce, Poland], where my uncle was born in 1895. Beyond both having been born in Upper Silesia, my uncle and von Pannwitz shared other things in common; they were close in age, only six years separated them; both were from the upper class; both were veterans of WW; both were victims of the Nazis; and both were anti-fascist.

Von Pannwitz was a Lutheran member of the Prussian nobility, who had been a captain in the German Army during WWI. In the early 1930’s, von Pannwitz operated a large garage business and dealt in fuel in Berlin. Not wishing to join the Nazi party, he went to Paris to live between 1937 and 1939. He was forced to return to Berlin, having been declared an “enemy alien” by the French, although he was able to use family influence to return to Paris. Once returned, he became involved with the movement that attempted to assassinate Hitler on July 20, 1944, an ultimately unsuccessful effort that forced him to go into hiding.

 

Figure 12. Else Petrea von Pannwitz’s baptismal record showing she was born on the 19th of February 1893 in Botzanowitz, Prussia

 

Wolfram von Pannwitz had a younger sister, “Else Petrea, Magda, Ernestine, Ottilie, Leonie, Gertrud,” born on the 19th of February 1893, also in Botzanowitz, Prussia. (Figure 12) He married Clara Virginia Rohde on the 18th of October 1920 in Berlin, a short-lived marriage that ended on the 28th of February 1922 and produced no children. (Figures 13a-b) He remarried Frida Mueller in 1931, who died of cancer in 1934, another childless marriage.

 

Figure 13a. Page 1 of Wolfram E. von Pannwitz and Clara Rohde’s marriage certificate showing they married on the 18th of October 1920 in Berlin with a notation in the upper right-hand corner indicating they divorced on the 28th of February 1922
Figure 13b. Page 2 of Wolfram E. von Pannwitz and Clara Rohde’s 1920 marriage certificate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let me briefly digress. During this Covid-19 pandemic we are currently living through that requires most of us to self-quarantine, I have spent countless hours listening to webinars on an investment service to which I am subscribed. In this context, an interesting fact about Mr. von Pannwitz caught my attention. Investing largely in aircraft stocks, he parlayed $15,000 he saved in 1948 and 1949 into $500,000 by the time he died in 1966. I find this interesting on multiple levels. He was heavily invested in the stock market long before this was commonplace, and seemingly followed a path to building his wealth by buying and holding stocks, a strategy the investment service I follow also subscribes to. He was also invested in a segment of the market, airlines, which have largely fallen out of favor, for obvious reasons, during the current pandemic.

 

Figure 14. The Hotel Seville where Wolfram E. von Pannwitz rented modest accommodations for $23 a week

 

Figure 15. Contemporary newspaper account from a New York daily discussing Wolfram E. von Pannwitz’s $500,000 bequest, split equally between Cardinal Spellman and the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society

Wolfram von Pannwitz died on the 28th of January 1966 in St. Vincent’s Hospital. At the time he lived modestly in a $23-a-week 9-by 12-foot room in the Hotel Seville on Madison Avenue (Figure 14), known today as the “James New York-NoMad.” His death made the news (Figure 15), including the New York Times, because he left his $500,000 estate equally to Cardinal Spellman of St. Patrick’s Cathedral and the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, “HIAS.” While Mr. Pannwitz was not Jewish, his bestowal to HIAS was his way of showing gratitude to his Jewish friends for their professional and personal help during his life. His bequest to the St. Patrick’s Cathedral was, in his own words, to thank them for the “. . .strength and power [they gave him] to accomplish the hard struggle for this life.”

Interestingly, Mr. von Pannwitz typed his will, dated the 4th of September 1958, on a conventional printed form. In the will, he stated “all my relatives, near or remote, shall be excluded from my inheritance, there being special reasons for this direction.” While none of the contemporary newspaper accounts discuss these “special reasons,” I know from my uncle’s November 1966 affidavit that upon Mr. von Pannwitz’s mother’s death, Gertrud von Pannwitz née Scholz in 1957, he was cheated out of his inheritance by his younger sister.

Based on surviving correspondence in my possession, sadly, Cardinal Spellman and the Catholic Church reached an out-of-court settlement with Wolfram’s sister, Elsa Petrea Reymann née von Pannwitz, after she contested the will. In the back-and-forth correspondence between my uncle Fedor and one of Mr. von Pannwitz’s friends in California, both expressed outrage that she managed to obtain any part of her brother’s estate.

Figure 16. German General Helmuth von Pannwitz in 1941, one of Wolfram von Pannwitz’s cousins, who fought for the German Army in the Battle of Stalingrad and later against Tito’s partisans in then-Yugoslavia

This would likely have been particularly galling to Mr. von Pannwitz given that he was estranged from his sister and because of his family’s connections to the Nazi regime. A certain Helmuth von Pannwitz (14th October 1898-16th January 1947) (Figure 16), also born in Botzwanowitz, Prussia and likely one of Wolfram’s cousins, was a German general; he fought in both world wars. In WWII, he was in command of a battle group assigned to cover the southern flank in the battle of Stalingrad, where he wiped out a Soviet cavalry brigade, a Soviet cavalry division, and an enemy infantry division. Later, Helmuth von Pannwitz established a Cossack volunteer force, the 1st Cossack Division, which fought against freedom fighters in the Ukraine and Belorussia, before eventually fighting partisans commanded by Tito in Yugoslavia. During punitive operations in Serbia and Croatia, the Cossack regiments under Pannwitz’s command committed several atrocities against the civilian population, including mass rapes and routine summary executions. In 1947, the same year that Wolfram immigrated to America, Helmuth was executed by the Russians for these war crimes.

 

REFERENCE

Rzhevskaya, Yelena. “Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter: From the Battle for Moscow to Hitler’s Bunker.” 2018. Greenhill Books. London.

POST 31: WITNESS TO HISTORY, “PROOF” OF HITLER’S DEATH IN MY UNCLE FEDOR’S OWN WORDS

Note:   In this post, I relate the story of my uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck’s knowledge of Adolf Hitler’s fate at the end of WWII, and how my uncle came in possession of this information.  The story is told in my uncle’s own words borrowing liberally from his first-hand account of these events and describes briefly where I obtained his story.  Recent discoveries and publications are also discussed.

Related Post

POST 17: SURVIVING IN BERLIN IN THE TIME OF HITLER: MY UNCLE FEDOR’S STORY

Post 17 chronicled my uncle’s survival in Berlin during WWII, touching briefly on the post-war events that ultimately led him to flee Germany and immigrate to America.  Thanks to two first-hand accounts written by my uncle following WWII, one a brief biography of his life, the second a compelling account he theatrically entitled “Former Berlin Dentist Proves Hitler is Dead,” I can now flesh out considerably more of my uncle’s life story and detail his knowledge of Hitler’s death.  My uncle’s first-hand accounts were given to his illegitimate son who died in 2014 and have since passed into the estate of his son, from whom I obtained copies.

Below, I review some of what was discussed in Post 17, but most of this post deals with newly uncovered facts from my uncle Fedor’s writings and elsewhere; they add considerably more texture to my uncle’s story and provide some detail on his role as a witness to an important historical event.  I also describe how my uncle came to be in possession of his information on Hitler’s fate.  I can imagine dubious readers scoffing at the notion that a Jewish dentist, a recently-persecuted one at that, would be in the right place at the right time in Berlin immediately after WWII to “prove” that Hitler had indeed died at the end of the war.  But, the facts are what they are as readers will learn.

The following narrative is unquestionably one my uncle would have told with more elan and precision.  Regrettably, my uncle is no longer here, so I must rely on his narrative to relate how he might have told his own story.  Regardless, since my uncle’s tale is also a part of my family’s overall story, I think it is important I tell it and tell it without embellishments and half-truths; enough of these already surround the topic of Hitler’s death.  As my uncle’s narrative makes clear, many writers, newspapers, and parties of his day sought to distort and discredit my uncle’s story, intentionally and unintentionally; some had broader political, social, or economic imperatives in mind, notably, Joseph Stalin.  My uncle lost control of his narrative, so it is my intention with this post to reestablish dominion over the story and refer to other recent sources which corroborate my uncle’s tale.

Figure 1. My Uncle Fedor Bruck in his WWI uniform

My uncle Dr. Fedor Bruck was born on August 17, 1895, in Leobschütz, Upper Silesia, Germany (today: Głubczyce, Poland).  My uncle’s three siblings, including a younger brother who died in infancy, were all born in near-by Ratibor (today: Racibórz, Poland); according to my uncle’s first-hand account, my grandparents moved from Leobschütz to Ratibor when my uncle was three years old to run the Bruck’s “Prinz von Preußen” Hotel, subject of Post 11.  During WWI, my uncle fought in Ukraine on the Eastern Front. (Figure 1) He studied dentistry at the University of Breslau (today: Wrocław, Poland), passed the State Board Examination in 1921, and eventually set up his own practice in 1924 in Liegnitz, Upper Silesia (today: Legnica, Poland). (Figure 2)

Figure 2. My Uncle Fedor in his dental office in Liegnitz

He owned his practice in Liegnitz from November 1924 through April 1936, when he was forced out of business by the National Socialists.  Already, by March 1932, the Nazis had relieved my uncle of his responsibilities as municipal school dentist (“Schulzahnarzt“) for schools in small communities surrounding Liegnitz; a Schulzahnarzt examined pupils‘ teeth, advising them on whether a followup with a dentist was required.  There was widespread support among German dentists for the National Socialist ideology, so in expectation of their rise to power many dental organizations displaced their Jewish colleagues as a sign of “anticipatory obedience.“  Since my uncle could no longer practice dentistry in Liegnitz, he left.  In his own words:

Figure 3. My Uncle Fedor in 1936, the year he moved from Liegnitz to Berlin

“In 1936 (Figure 3), I moved to Berlin, where I continued practicing as a dentist until October 1942.  In that month I went underground to escape arrest, deportation to a concentration camp and even death, after having been warned that the Gestapo was preparing to pick me up. . .After thirty months of a trying ordeal, Berlin was occupied and the Nazi regime was brought to an end.“

 

 

 

In my uncle’s account of the events following the end of the war, the chronicle previously alluded to entitled “Former Berlin Dentist Proves that Hitler is Dead,“ my uncle explains the circumstances that put him in a position to be a witness to history:

“By reason of an interlocking of events, I believe that I am the only person on the Western Hemisphere to bring proof that Hitler is actually dead, as far as such is possible at all for someone who has not seen the corpse.  However, if the corpse has been cremated, and the remains of the teeth are the only thing left, then only the dentist is able to make an identification.

All reports of the finding and identification of Hitler’s jaws are the result of my information given to correspondents or members of the occupying armies after the occupation of Berlin by the Allies.  Since my statements were only repeated in part, or were misquoted or reported not in their correct sequence, they lack any proof.  I therefore believe that the time has come to publish my knowledge of the identification of the jaws of Hitler and Eva Braun, which took place between May 9th and 13th, 1945.

Figure 4. A young Käthe Heusermann, née Reiss, with my Uncle Fedor in his dental office in Liegnitz

The main person in this connection is Mrs. Käthe Heusermann, née Reiss regarding whom I must mention more details, because of the importance attached to her in this matter.  She was born in 1909, and I trained her as a dental assistant in my office in Liegnitz, Silesia, in the year 1926 (Figure 4).  She practiced in this profession until 1945, at least 15 years.  Over this time, she worked with me for three-and-a-half years, and from 1937 on, that is for over eight years, she worked with Blaschke, Hitler’s dentist.  She quickly advanced to the position of first assistant and, during the last years, she was mostly present during Hitler’s treatments, whether they took place in the Reich Chancellery or on the Obersalzberg estate.  She was very much interested in her profession and possessed great experience.  She had the special gift to remember very well the peculiarities of the patients’ mouths . . .”

Figure 5. Hitler’s American-trained dentist, Dr. Hugo Blaschke

Regarding Hitler’s American-trained dentist, Professor Hugo Blaschke (Figure 5), my uncle made the following observations:

“. . .He [Blaschke] studied at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia before the first World War, from which he graduated.  Since he had not passed any examination in Germany, he was only rated a dental technician there.  Having joined the [Nazi] Party early, he had a membership number below 40,000.  He had already treated Hitler before 1933.  Upon a decree by Goebbels, he was awarded the title of dentist, without having to pass any examination, and was later given the professor title by Hitler.  His knowledge was that of an average dentist . . .“

It is important to emphasize the point my uncle Fedor was making about Hitler’s dentist.  In former times, there were two types of German dentists which were distinctly different, one called a “zahnarzt,” the other a “dentist,” confusingly, both of which translate as dentist in English.  Dr. Blaschke would today be called a “zahntechniker,” a non-academically trained dental technician primarily responsible for producing bridges and dentures, or “zahnbehandler,” dental practitioner.  A “zahnarzt” in today’s parlance is an academically-trained dentist.  This distinction as it relates to Dr. Blaschke becomes important later, insofar as the technical work he performed on Hitler.

Continuing with my uncle’s story:

“On April 26, 1945, Steglitz, in the southwestern part of the city [Berlin], was occupied by the Russians.  Behind the advancing troops, I arrived, on May 4th, in the apartment of my former assistant Käthe Heusermann.  This apartment was situated at Pariserstrasse 39-40 near Kurfürstendamm.  A friendship of twenty years tied my person and the family of Käthe HeusermannKäthe was alone in the bomb-damaged apartment and was very upset and confused.  She had only returned to her apartment the day before, May 3rd, having spent the time before that in the Air Shelter in the Reich Chancellery.

My uncle recounted what Käthe told him:

“When the bombardment of Berlin became disagreeable, she went to the Reich Chancellery for reasons of safety, where she worked as a nurse in the hospital shelter.  On April 20th, Hitler’s birthday, Blaschke fled to Obersalzburg by plane.  She was almost punished for disobedience by the SS for her refusal to go along.  On April 28, Hitler and Eva Braun got married.  Upon having received the news of Himmler’s offer of negotiations with the Allies, and when the army which was supposed to liberate Berlin did not arrive, which was to have been led by Wenck, Hitler had temper tantrums, but then calmed down, but was depressed and personally distributed cyanide capsules to everybody present.  Käthe herself showed me—while relating the events—the capsule she had received.

On April 30th, Hitler and Eva Braun committed suicide, he by taking a cyanide capsule between his teeth, and shooting himself in the head.  The corpses were then taken into the Reich Chancellery garden by the SS, drenched in gasoline and burned.

Goebbels and his wife also committed suicide, his children having previously been given injections with poison, by doctors.

Käthe’s reports with respect to these happenings coincides almost completely with statements made later by other witnesses . . .”

Following Hitler’s death, the staff in the Reich Chancellery divided themselves into smaller groups, hoping to break through the Russian lines, and get to the West.  Resuming:

“The group which Mrs. Heusermann has joined, came to heavy combat with the Russians at the Weidendamm Bridge.  In this battle, Deputy Leader [Martin] Bormann died . . .Of about 80 persons, only 30 were left, and these fled into the subway shaft.  They hoped to get somewhere behind the Russians but were caught by the Russians at a station.  The men were deported, while Mrs. Heusermann was taken along by a soldier and raped by him.  Then he let her go, and she had to take the long walk home, through debris and corpses, always in fear of new insults.”

Figure 6. Entrance to Kurfürstendamm 213 in Charlottenburg, where Dr. Blaschke had his dental practice, as it looks today

After recounting these events to my uncle, Käthe Heusermann advised my uncle to obtain permission from the pertinent authorities to take over Dr. Blaschke’s dental practice.  The dental office was intact, and Dr. Blaschke had already fled to Obersalzburg, as previously mentioned, and was hardly likely to return.  As a person persecuted by the Nazis, my uncle had a right to make this claim.  The authorities did in fact grant my uncle permission to take over Dr. Blaschke’s apartment and practice at Kurfürstendamm 213 in Charlottenburg (Figure 6); as discussed in Post 17, post-WWII Address Directories locate my uncle at this address. (Figure 7) My uncle’s knowledge of the events surrounding Hitler’s fate, thus, stem both from his friendship with Käthe Heusermann, as well as his occupancy of Dr. Blaschke’s dental office.

Figure 7. Page from 1946 Berlin Phone Directory listing my Uncle Fedor as a “zahnarzt” at Kurfürstendamm 213 in Charlottenburg, the former dental office of Hitler’s dentist

Continuing with my uncle’s narrative:

“Then, during the days following . . . happenings took place which I believe to be proof that Hitler actually died.  On Wednesday, May 9th, 1945, I met a Russian Lieutenant Colonel in the building, as well as woman in uniform and a gentleman in mufti, as they inquired from the Superintendent as to the whereabouts of Blaschke.  As I learned later, they were the deputy military governor of Berlin, a female agent of the Russian secret police, and a certain Doctor Arnaudow, who had been assistant at the Berlin Charité with “Geheimrat Sauerbruch” [“Geheimrat Sauerbruch” is a successful and respected physician].  The latter was a Bulgarian and had brought the Russians who were looking for Hitler’s dentist . . .; furthermore, he acted as interpreter, although the agent of the Russian Secret Police, who called herself “Lola,” spoke a little German.

Since the Superintendent could give them no information, I declared that Blaschke had fled and that I now had his practice.  Then they asked me for written details regarding the treatments which Hitler had received.  Upon my remark that I presumed they wanted to identify parts of corpses found, the Lieutenant Colonel made a sour face and put his finger to his mouth, from which I assumed that my suspicion had been correct.  Then they came to the office, where we looked for reference cards as well as X-rays of Hitler.  However, only those of Göring, Goebbels, Himmler, Ley and other high-ranking party members could be found, which the Russians took with them.  Upon their question whether anybody knew about Hitler’s teeth, I called in the former technician of Blaschke, Fritz Echtmann, who lived with his family in the same apartment [building].  He could not give them any information, since he never was present at a treatment, and since the technical work had been done before his time.  When it was found that Käthe Heusermann had been present for many years at all treatments of Hitler, I was asked to get her. “

My uncle found Käthe at the home of a neighboring doctor’s.  She was apparently very hesitant to come with my uncle because of her previous experience with the Russians and her fear she would be considered a prominent Nazi.  However, feeling she had no choice, she came along and was questioned by the Russians about Hitler’s mouth and provided the following information:

“On a front tooth there was a so-called rim-crown, furthermore there was a cut-off bridge in his mouth, since the molar, which would have served as support, had to be removed.  She gave them more details regarding some crowns and other treatments . . .She furthermore declared that the written data regarding Hitler’s treatments were kept in a box which was either still at the Chancellery, or which Blaschke had taken with him to Obersalzberg.

Then the Lieutenant Colonel asked her to come along with him to the Chancellery, to look for the box . . .”

Figure 8. Page from a 1941 Berlin Phone Directory listing Dr. Blaschke’s dental technician, Fritz Echtmann, as a “dentist”

Käthe was not returned to her apartment until two days later, on Friday, May 11th, at which point the Russians then took the technician Fritz Echtmann. (Figure 8) My uncle visited her on Saturday, and she painted the following picture of what had transpired:

 

“First of all, they asked that she give as detailed as possible a description of Hitler’s teeth, with pertinent sketches.  Then she was shown a number of skulls and parts of jaws, on which there was still some flesh, which in some instances were charred or burned.  Among these, she definitely recognized the jaws of Hitler, with the aid of the details written down, and the peculiarities she had noted.  One jaw, which contained a bridge made from Palapont (i.e., artificial colophonium on a colloidal base), was identified as that of Eva Braun, who had received this bridge only a few weeks previously.  She declared, upon questioning that the technical work had been done by Fritz Echtmann, Blaschke’s technician.  This fact most probably was the reason for later on picking up Fritz Echtmann.

During the entire time, the Russians took down in writing the proceedings, which Käthe had to sign on each page.  She also had to swear that she would not speak of the identification of the remains of Hitler, until the Russian Press and the Radio would have published same.  Lola, of whom Käthe only had heard . . . that she was an agent of the Russian Secret Service, said to her ‘Mrs. Käthe, you will be a very famous woman, you are the only person who not only knows, but also can prove that Hitler is really dead’”

My uncle learned from Fritz Echtmann’s wife that her husband came home on Sunday, May 13, 1945, accompanied by two Russian Officers, and was given about two hours to pack his suitcases before again being taken away.  Käthe was also taken away at the same time, told she would be needed for longer but not to be afraid.  From that time on, my uncle did not learn of their whereabouts for many years.

The above were the facts as reported by my uncle insofar as the days in May 1945 are concerned, but my uncle also wrote about happenings thereafter, specifically related to news correspondents and writers and the inaccurate accounts they published:

“In the beginning of July 1945, the Allied occupation forces arrived in Berlin.  The U.S. Correspondent Sigrid Schulz met with Käthe Heusermann’s doctor . . .and this doctor told her that the Russians had taken Käthe along.  She [Sigrid Schulz] came to me with a few American Correspondents on July 5, 1945, to my practice, in order to find out whether Käthe had come back.  On this occasion I told her about the identification of Hitler’s teeth, but I noticed from the questions that my report was regarded as fantastic and not believed.  On July 7th, three English correspondents, lead by William Forrest of the London’News Chronicle‘ came to me.  I gave them the report of what had happened, and within the next few days, a story appeared in the English newspapers, without any commentary and so distorted that no burden of proof could be put on these reports.  However, this publication of my name and address made it possible to contact my family in England again, who believed me dead as victim of the Nazis.“

It is clear from the above that because my uncle’s story was so seemingly preposterous and unbelievable, news correspondents took the opportunity to weave their own tales.  Consequently, my uncle almost immediately lost control of the story he had to tell and its factual basis.  Continuing:

“Thereafter, I was frequently called upon by correspondents who, however, greatly doubted my stories, and therefore most of those reports showed incorrect facts.  One paper said I was the Führer’s dentist, another one said that I had identified the corpse.  Aside from many strange statements, the identification of Hitler’s jaws was branded as false.  ‘France-Soir,’ on January 1, 1946, reported that the corpse had been discovered on December 19, 1945 by the Russians and that Hitler’s dentist, who [they claimed, albeit falsely] was a captive of the Russians, had identified the corpse.  However, Blaschke is a prisoner of the Americans . . .Even the publication in ‘Oral Hygiene,’ 35th year, page 1540, September 1945, is very incomplete and distorted . . .how little importance was given to my knowledge regarding the circumstances, is shown by the fact that no mention was made in Trevor-Roper’s book at all [1947 Edition].”

Hugh Trevor-Roper was the author of “The Last Days of Hitler,” initially published in 1947.  More will be said on Trevor-Roper below.

In his account, my uncle addresses some objections raised by correspondents.  A few claimed that everyone in the Reich Chancellery could have been told that Hitler committed suicide when in fact he didn’t, but how then does one explain the existence of jaws for a non-existent corpse? 

Alternatively, Selkirk Paton of the “Daily Express” wondered how my uncle knew that Hitler was really in the Reich Chancellery, suggesting the jaws found there might have been that of one of Hitler’s doubles.  Beyond the fact that Käthe Heusermann would have noticed a double, the conditions for this scenario to have played out are practically inconceivable.  At the least, this would have required that the dental work done on the double correspond with the work known to have been done on Hitler, that the double then shoot himself or be shot, the body burned, and the jaws or another prepared skull left in a place where the Russians could find it, an implausible sequence of events.  Only Dr. Blaschke and Käthe Heusermann knew anything about Hitler’s teeth, so one or both of them would have had to be party to the deception.  To believe the jaws found at the Reich Chancellery belonged to a double requires too lengthy a list of suppositions to merit serious consideration.

Yet another objection to my uncle’s explanation of events was that with the amount of gasoline employed, no remains would have been left to find.  My uncle was easily able to refute this:

“This assumption is erroneous; I myself have seen many charred corpses during the last fighting days in Berlin, where parts were undamaged or could be recognized in part.  I myself am astonished that the bridge of Eva Braun made of Palapont material, which is easily combustible, was not destroyed, but I could imagine that the entire body was not enveloped by gasoline, especially, since Käthe mentioned explicitly that some flesh, either charred burned or raw, was still on the bones.”

Returning to a subject I alluded to earlier, regarding the rim-crowns and cut-off bridges with which Hitler was fitted by Dr. Blaschke, my uncle made a few interesting observations related to this work:

“. . .The peculiarities of Hitler’s jaws are very extraordinary ones.  Rim-crowns are seen very rarely only, since present-day dentists do not make them any longer, and cut-off bridges are not frequent either . . .

I had pointed out to correspondents a rim-crown as being ‘old-fashioned’ which, because of its comparative rarity, necessarily constituted an important factor [in the identification of Hitler’s jaws].

The fact that Dr. Blaschke knowingly performed ‘old-fashioned work’ on ‘his Führer,’ seems to me, as expert, rather ridiculous.  On the other hand, he does not owe his title of professor, nor his various other titles, to the fact that he was an ace in his profession, but only to the fact that he was a faithful Nazi having a party membership number somewhere around 36,000 . . .”

After immigrating to America in July 1947, my uncle continued to follow news reports of Hitler’s fate.  My uncle remarked on a series of six articles published by the “New York World-Telegram,” between July 19 and July 24, 1948, entitled “Is Adolf Hitler Dead or Alive?” written by Capt. Michael A. Musmanno, USNR, Judge International War Crimes Trials, Nuremberg. 

The fifth article in this series, dated July 23, 1948, was of particular interest to my uncle since it dealt with the testimony of a Hans Fritzsche, who, as it turns out, had been in a Russian prison with Fritz Echtmann, Blaschke’s dental technician.  My uncle surmised they were imprisoned together at the Lubyanka prison in Moscow, where Fritzsche was held by the Russians before he was brought to Nuremberg for trial.  In any case, Fritzsche testified that Echtmann claimed he turned over X-rays of Hitler’s teeth to the Russians, and that together with Käthe Heusermann had identified a jaw shown to him as that of Hitler.  My uncle knew this was not true.  In his own words:

“Echtmann was Blaschke’s dental technician, but never his assistant; moreover, he had never done any technical work for Hitler, was never present at any treatment, and had no opportunity to gain any knowledge regarding the Führer’s mouth.  While Hitler’s jaw had already been identified by Käthe Heusermann between May 9th and May 11th, 1945, Echtmann was not questioned by the Russians before May 11, when they [the Russians] brought back Mrs. Heusermann.

Echtmann could not have given the Russians the X-rays of Hitler’s teeth, since these were not in his possession.  They were actually in a case which either remained on the Obersalzberg, or whom Blaschke took with him when he fled.  When the Russians appeared for the first time in my office in Berlin, and questioned Echtmann about Hitler’s teeth, X-rays, etc., in my presence, he declared that he knew nothing whatsoever about these things . . .He had far too great a craving for importance to make plausible any such hiding of his knowledge.  It was probably this same desire to prove himself important that explains his version of the story as told to Fritzsche . . .”

Clearly, in my uncle’s opinion, Echtmann was nothing but a self-aggrandizer, although my uncle left open the faint possibility that Echtmann had taken a few X-rays from the files at an earlier date as souvenirs, which he produced when questioned by the Russians.

Figure 9. Page from a 1956 Berlin Phone Directory showing that Fritz Echtmann resumed his career as “dentist” following his release by the Soviets in 1954 at the same address as before, Kurfürstendamm 212 in Charlottenburg

From Fritzsche’s testimony, as described in the New York World-Telegram, my uncle, however, was able to learn about Echtmann’s more recent fate.  Echtmann was finally released by the Russians in the spring of 1954 (Figure 9), while Käthe Heusermann returned to her family in 1955, after having been declared dead in 1950.

 

 

 

 

 

My uncle lamented his inability to parlay his knowledge of Hitler’s fate into something marketable:

Figure 10. Rejection letter from “Life” magazine sent to my Uncle Fedor’s agent, regarding his story about Hitler’s fate

“I tried very hard to interest some magazines in my story, among them Colliers, Life, Time, Newsreel, and Saturday Evening Post, but was not successful.  My story appeared so fantastic that nobody believed it was true.  Some editors advised me that they were publishing only staff-written manuscripts (Figure 10), others that my story did not correspond with the tenor of their magazines or that there was no public interest anymore in a story about Hitler.  Finally, the time element diminished the possibilities to develop my story into a saleable manuscript.”

Hugh Trevor-Roper, following the release by the Russians of Fritz Echtmann, Käthe Heusermann, and others, published a Third Edition in 1956 of his book “The Last Days of Hitler.”  My uncle remarked about this:

“Professor H. R. Trevor-Roper . . .refers in the Introduction . . . of his book to the fact that two Russian officers, a man and a woman, called on May 9, 1945 at the surgery of Dr. Hugo Blaschke, Hitler’s dentist, which was then carried on by me, and asked for Hitler’s dental records.  Apart from newspaper reports, this was the first time, that the names of Fritz Echtmann, Käthe Heusermann, as well as my name were mentioned in a book of historical importance and value.  Though Trevor-Roper’s story contains many inaccuracies, it generally covers what happened on and after May 9, 1945 with respect to the identification of Hitler’s jaws.”

My uncle Fedor passed away in February 1982, too soon to see himself vindicated and have his account of events in May 1945 validated.  But validation has come, and, interestingly, in just the past few years and months.

Travelling with the Soviet vanguard when they entered the center of Berlin on April 29, 1945, was a 26-year-old Jewish woman named Elena Rzhevskaya, born Elena Moiseyevna Kagan in Belarus in 1919.  She was a military interpreter for SMERSH, the Soviet counter-intelligence agency.  Like my uncle, she was a witness to events and findings about Hitler’s fate, corroborating much of what my uncle reported.  As the Soviet forces advanced through Berlin, Rzhevskaya’s unit was tasked with finding people who could provide information on Hitler’s whereabouts.

Let me provide a little more context.  The Soviets entered Hitler’s underground command center, the Führerbunker under the Reich Chancellery, on May 2nd.  The next day, they apparently discovered the bodies of Joseph and Magda Goebbels’ six children in their bunk beds.  Then, on May 5th, some charred human remains, including parts of a skull, some jawbones, and some teeth, were found in a shell crater in the Reich Chancellery garden.  These were apparently taken to SMERSH headquarters in the north of Berlin and given to pathologists under strict instructions to keep their work under wraps.

Rzhevskaya was summoned to the pathology lab, and entrusted by her boss, Colonel Vassily Gorbushin, with a large, satin-lined, dark-red cigar box, containing what he believed to be Hitler’s remains.  Ms. Rzhevskaya was asked to verify this.  As my uncle recorded, the Soviets eventually learned about Käthe Heusermann when they visited Dr. Blaschke’s practice where my uncle had taken up residence.  It is my very strong belief that “Lola . . .the female agent of the Soviet secret police,” referred to in my uncle’s account of events, was in fact Elena Rzhevskaya.  In any case, after locating and interrogating Käthe Heusermann, as my uncle reported, Käthe confirmed the teeth were Hitler’s.

According to Elena Rzhevskaya’s memoir, Käthe Heusermann lead the Soviets to a special office that Blaschke kept at the Reich Chancellery where Hitler was treated; it was a dental office, fully stocked with dental tools and reclining chair, where Hitler’s dental X-rays were also discovered, the irrefutable evidence identifying Hitler’s teeth.  Either Käthe never mentioned to my uncle that the X-rays of Hitler’s teeth had been found in the Reich Chancellery, had been instructed by the Russians not to discuss this, or he oddly failed to make note of this important fact in his account; we may never know.  Regardless, the Soviets knew all along that Hitler was dead but, Stalin, for reasons we can only guess at, likely believed that if Hitler was alive, then Nazism was an ever-present danger; his desire to conceal the truth may also have been his opening salvo in the nascent Cold War.  Consequently, Stalin squelched the truth and detained those who could prove Hitler was dead.  Heusermann and Echtmann were arrested and secretly moved to Moscow, an eventuality my uncle was alerted to by American authorities, explaining why he decamped to America in 1947.  Heusermann was held in solitary confinement for six years without trial, eventually charged, and sentenced to 10 years in the Gulag in 1951.  However, her release was negotiated in 1955 by the West Germans, a few years after Stalin’s death.

In 1965, 12 years after Stalin’s death, during the comparatively liberal Khruschev years, Ms. Rzhevskaya was permitted to publish some of her notes on “Berlin, May 1945,” in the Russian literary magazine “Znayma.”  During the Gorbachev era in 1986, she published her first memoir, “Berlin, May 1945: Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter,” but the editor removed any mention of the identification of Hitler’s teeth.  It is only in 2017 that an English version of her memoir, “Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter: From the Battle of Rzhev to Hitler’s Bunker,” was published and that mention of Ms. Rzhevskaya’s role in helping identify Hitler’s teeth was made.

There’s an interesting and personal family anecdote to this story.  As mentioned, the English-language version of Ms. Rzhevskaya’s book was published only in 2017, shortly after her death.  In connection with the release, “The Times of Israel” published an article entitled, “The woman who carried Hitler’s teeth on V-Day,” and interviewed her grand-daughter Liubov Summ.  According to Ms. Summ, Käthe Heusermann and Elena Rzhevskaya bonded during questioning and Käthe shared personal stories with Elena.  Among them, Käthe told Ms. Rzhevskaya that at various times she had hidden in her home a Jewish dentist for whom she had worked before the war, the dentist obviously being my uncle Fedor.  According to Ms. Rzhevskaya, my uncle showed up in late April 1945 and asked whether Käthe could hide him in her apartment, this when she was still reporting for work at the Führerbunker.  While I have no doubt my uncle occasionally sought refuge with Käthe in his 30 months underground, I sincerely doubt this happened in April or May 1945.

A very recent development also warrants mention.  An article was published on May 21, 2018 in “Deutsche Welle,” entitled “Hitler’s teeth analysis dispels myths of Nazi leader’s survival.”  A team of French pathologists was recently allowed to examine a set of teeth kept in Moscow that were recovered in Berlin in May 1945.  According to the article, this is the first time the Russian authorities had allowed anyone to examine these remains in over 70 years.  The researchers’ conclusions, published in May 2018, in the “European Journal of Internal Medicine,” unambiguously concluded the teeth belonged to Hitler and proved he died in 1945.

My uncle certainly would have felt some measure of satisfaction in having the naysayers, self-aggrandizers, and purveyors of half-truths get their comeuppance as to the facts of Hitler’s fate.  But, my uncle was a boundless optimist, not a vengeful man and certainly not one to dwell on “what-might-have-been,” and would have been happy that the truth of what happened to Hitler in the waning days of WWII eventually came out.  A confirmation of the role he played in bringing facts to light and acknowledgement that his story was true would have brought him enormous pleasure.  So, in some small way, I hope this Blog post accomplishes this.

REFERENCES

Charlier, P., Well, R., Rainsard, P., Poupon, J., and Brisard, J.C.

2018    The remains of Adolf Hitler: A biomedical analysis and definitive identification.  European Journal of Internal Medicine.

Chase, Jefferson

2018    Hitler’s teeth analysis dispels myths of Nazi leader’s survival.  Deutsche Welle (May 21, 2018).

Linge, Mary Kay

2018    How the woman who identified Hitler’s dental remains ended up in prison.  New York Post (July 16, 2018).

Masis, Julie

2017    The woman who carried Hitler’s teeth on V-Day.  The Times of Israel (September 6, 2017)

Rzhevskaya, Elena

2018    Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter: From the Battle of Rzhev to Hitler’s Bunker. Greenhill Books. London.

Trevor, Roper, H.R.

1947    The Last Days of Hitler.  The Macmillan Company. New York.

1987    The Last Days of Hitler (Sixth Edition).  The University of Chicago Press. Chicago (p. 32-33)